The novice nurse and clinical decision-making: how to avoid errors: Novice nurse clinical decision-making
Open accessAbstract
AIM: The purpose of this integrative review is to present the evidence in relation to novice nurses' errors when faced with clinical decision-making in the first years of a nursing career. BACKGROUND: Recent studies identify a need for nursing schools to produce 30,000 new graduates each year to keep up with the nursing shortage. Novice nurses may be at greater risk for errors than experienced nurses. As the novice nurse moves into practice, it is imperative to recognize potential mistakes in order to prevent errors. EVALUATION: Articles selected included information regarding types of errors, causes of errors and potential interventions for the novice nurse. KEY ISSUES: The primary types of errors committed by the novice nurses include medication errors, patient falls and delay in treatment. The causes of such errors are complex. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Improved patient outcomes, reduced liability and higher retention/satisfaction are all potential benefits of reducing the errors made by novice nurses. Simply being aware of the type of problems may be an important first step in improving the care by novice nurses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research has identified deficiencies in CDM among novice nurses and new graduates entering the workforce.
“research has identified deficiencies in this ability among novice nurses and new graduates entering the workforce (Nibbelink & Brewer, 2018; Saintsing et al., 2011).”
From A comparative vignette study: Evaluating the potential role of a generative <scp>AI</scp> model in enhancing clinical <scp>decision‐making</scp> in nursing (2025) · cites this paper as Saintsing et al., 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Labrague, L. J., & de los Santos, J. A. A. (2021) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151476 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Sound clinical judgment in nursing: A concept analysis: MANETTI
Manetti, W. (2019) · Nursing Forum · doi:10.1111/nuf.12303 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Saban, M., & Dubovi, I. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.16101 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“However, multiple barriers still prohibit sufficient CDM, especially among novice nurses (Alowais et al., 2023 ; Fazlollahi et al., 2022 ; Saintsing et al., 2011 ).”
Mwale, O. G., Mukwato, P. K., & Kabinga-Makukula, M. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03064-2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- SAINTSING, D., GIBSON, L. M., & PENNINGTON, A. W.
- Affiliations
- Florida Department of Health in Orange County (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Management
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 354-359
- ISSN
- 0966-0429 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1491752003
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Nursing Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Keywords
- novice nurses, clinical decision-making, nursing errors, medication errors, patient falls, treatment delay, error prevention, nursing education, nursing shortage, nurse retention, patient safety
- MeSH terms
- Accidental Falls, Clinical Competence, Educational Measurement, Educational Status, Humans, Nursing, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Medical Errors, Nurse's Role, Delayed Diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review