The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Salivary flow, saliva, pH and buffering capacity in 70‐year‐old men and women: Correlation to dental health, dryness in the mouth, disease and drug treatment*
Abstract
Summary: A representative systematic selection of 30% of all 70‐year‐olds (1148 persons) in Göteborg were invited to a population study. The participation rate was 85%. Sixteen per cent of the men and 25% of the women reported dryness in the mouth (sex. diff.P<0.01). There was a significant correlation between the number of drugs consumed by the subjects and subjective dryness (in both sexes P<0.001). Intake of drugs from the groups of anticholionergics, antihistamines, sedatives, hypnotics or phenothiazines respectively seemed to have the highest predicative value for dryness in the mouth (men P<0.05 and women P<0.01). There was also a positive correlation between subjective dryness and number of definable diseases in both sexes (P<0.01). In a consecutive sample (fifty‐eight men and fifty‐three women) a study of salivary flow, direct pH and buffer effect were performed. The mean value of unstimulated salivary secretion was in men 0.25 and in women 0.18ml/min. Corresponding figures for stimulated secretion was 1.65 and 1.04ml/min (sex. diff.P<0.01). A significantly lower unstimulated secretion was noted in women with subjective dryness (P<0.01). A negative significant correlation were found between dental invalidity, according to Eichner's classification, and stimulated secretion when drug treatment had been considered (men P<0.05 and women P<0.01). Only weak relations were noted between salivary secretions and drug treatment. Only intake of drugs with diuretic effect were negatively correlated to stimulated secretion (P<0.01). Diseases of the circulatory system were correlated to subjective dryness (P<0.01).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Health benefits of saliva: a review
Dodds, M. W. J., Johnson, D. A., & Yeh, C.-K. (2005) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.009 · Cited by 696
Meta-analysis: Risk of dry mouth with second generation antidepressants
Cappetta, K., Beyer, C., Johnson, J. A., & Bloch, M. H. (2018) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.12.012 · Cited by 49
Oral pilocarpine for treatment of opioid-induced oral dryness in healthy adults
Götrick, B., Åkerman, S., Ericson, D., Torstenson, R., & Tobin, G. (2004) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/154405910408300508 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- ÖSTERBERG, T., LANDAHL, S., & HEDEGÅRD, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-170
- ISSN
- 0305-182X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2842
- OpenAlex
- W2105256358
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Salivary flow, saliva, pH and buffering capacity in 70‐year‐old men and women: Correlation to dental health, dryness in the mouth, disease and drug treatment*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1984.tb00565.x
- The paper
- ÖSTERBERG, T., LANDAHL, S., & HEDEGÅRD, B. (1984). Salivary flow, saliva, pH and buffering capacity in 70‐year‐old men and women: Correlation to dental health, dryness in the mouth, disease and drug treatment*. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1984.tb00565.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.