Cited by 93Temporomandibular Joint DisordersOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsOccupational health in dentistry

Efficacy of stabilisation splint treatment on temporomandibular disorders

NIEMELÄ, K., KORPELA, M., RAUSTIA, A., YLÖSTALO, P., SIPILÄ, K.·2012·Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Abstract

The evidence supporting the use of stabilisation splints in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) is scarce and a need for well-controlled studies exists. The aim of this randomised, controlled trial study was to assess the efficacy of stabilisation splint treatment on TMD. The sample consisted of 80 consecutive referred patients who were randomly assigned to the splint group (n = 39) and the control group (n = 41). Subjects in the splint group were treated with a stabilisation splint, whereas subjects in the control group did not receive any treatment except counselling and instructions for masticatory muscle exercises which were given also to the subjects in the splint group. Outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) on facial pain intensity and clinical findings for TMD which were measured at baseline and after 1-month follow-up. The differences in change between the groups were analysed using regression models. Facial pain decreased and most of the clinical TMD findings resolved in both of the groups. The differences in changes in VAS or clinical TMD findings between the groups were not statistically significant. The findings of this study did not show that stabilisation splint treatment in combination with counselling and masticatory muscle exercises has additional benefit in relieving facial pain and increasing the mobility of the mandible than counselling and masticatory muscle exercises alone in a short time-interval.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02335.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NIEMELÄ, K., KORPELA, M., RAUSTIA, A., YLÖSTALO, P., & SIPILÄ, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Oulu (FI)
  • Oulu University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
SIPILÄ, K.
Venue
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-19
Volume
39
Issue
11
Pages
799-804
ISSN
  • 0305-182X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2842
OpenAlex
W2121934095
Cited by
93
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6
FWCI
13.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Oral Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Occupational health in dentistry
Keywords
temporomandibular disorders, occlusal splint, facial pain, counseling, mandibular mobility, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Counseling, Joint Dislocations, Facial Pain, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mandible, Masticatory Muscles, Osteoarthritis, Pain Measurement, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome, Range of Motion, Articular, Treatment Outcome, Occlusal Splints, Arthralgia, Temporomandibular Joint Disc, Muscle Stretching Exercises

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review