Efficacy of stabilisation splint treatment on temporomandibular disorders
Abstract
The evidence supporting the use of stabilisation splints in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) is scarce and a need for well-controlled studies exists. The aim of this randomised, controlled trial study was to assess the efficacy of stabilisation splint treatment on TMD. The sample consisted of 80 consecutive referred patients who were randomly assigned to the splint group (n = 39) and the control group (n = 41). Subjects in the splint group were treated with a stabilisation splint, whereas subjects in the control group did not receive any treatment except counselling and instructions for masticatory muscle exercises which were given also to the subjects in the splint group. Outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) on facial pain intensity and clinical findings for TMD which were measured at baseline and after 1-month follow-up. The differences in change between the groups were analysed using regression models. Facial pain decreased and most of the clinical TMD findings resolved in both of the groups. The differences in changes in VAS or clinical TMD findings between the groups were not statistically significant. The findings of this study did not show that stabilisation splint treatment in combination with counselling and masticatory muscle exercises has additional benefit in relieving facial pain and increasing the mobility of the mandible than counselling and masticatory muscle exercises alone in a short time-interval.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Niemela et al reported that pain on TMJ palpation increased significantly in the splint group compared with the control group.
“Niemela et al 73 reported that pain on TMJ palpation increased significantly in the splint group compared with the control group.”
From Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Therapeutic Exercise for Temporomandibular Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [73]
When pooling results for mouth opening, nonsignificant differences were obtained between general jaw exercises and splint therapy, global re-education posture, splint plus counseling, or standard conservative care.
“When pooling results for mouth opening, 55,71,73,92,94,95,97 nonsignificant differences were obtained between general jaw exercises and splint therapy, global re-education posture, splint plus counseling, or standard conservative care.”
From Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Therapeutic Exercise for Temporomandibular Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [73]
Compared with other forms of active treatments, such as splints, a global postural re-education program, or acupuncture, no significant differences between these treatments were found.
“However, compared with other forms of active treatments, such as splints, a global postural re-education program, or acupuncture, [72][73][74]95,95,98,99 no significant differences between these treatments were found.”
From Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Therapeutic Exercise for Temporomandibular Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [73]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Armijo-Olivo, S., Pitance, L., Singh, V., Neto, F., Thie, N., & Michelotti, A. (2016) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20140548 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
- Authors
- NIEMELÄ, K., KORPELA, M., RAUSTIA, A., YLÖSTALO, P., & SIPILÄ, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Oulu (FI)
- Oulu University Hospital (FI)
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- Corresponding author
- SIPILÄ, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-19
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 799-804
- ISSN
- 0305-182X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2842
- OpenAlex
- W2121934095
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 13.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Occupational health in dentistry
- Keywords
- temporomandibular disorders, occlusal splint, facial pain, counseling, mandibular mobility, treatment efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Counseling, Joint Dislocations, Facial Pain, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mandible, Masticatory Muscles, Osteoarthritis, Pain Measurement, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome, Range of Motion, Articular, Treatment Outcome, Occlusal Splints, Arthralgia, Temporomandibular Joint Disc, Muscle Stretching Exercises
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review