Possibility that certain hypnotics might cause cancer in skin
Abstract
Fifteen epidemiologic studies have associated hypnotic drugs with excess mortality, especially excess cancer deaths. Until recently, insufficient controlled trials were available to demonstrate whether hypnotics actually cause any cancers. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Approval History and Documents were accessed for zaleplon, eszopiclone and ramelteon. Since zolpidem was used as a comparison drug in zaleplon trials, some zolpidem data were also available. Incident cancers occurring during randomized hypnotics administration or placebo administration were tabulated. Combining controlled trials for the four drugs, there were 6190 participants given hypnotics and 2535 given placebo in parallel. There were eight mentions of incident non-melanoma skin cancers among participants receiving hypnotics but no comparable mentions of cancers among those receiving placebo (P = 0.064, one-tailed). There were also four mentions of incident tumors of uncertain malignancy among those receiving hypnotics but none among those receiving placebo, so combining uncertain and definite malignancies yielded a more significant contrast (P = 0.016). FDA files revealed that all four of the new hypnotics were associated with cancers in rodents. Three had been shown to be clastogenic. Together with the epidemiologic data and laboratory studies, the available evidence signals that new hypnotics may increase cancer risk. Due to limitations in available data, confirmatory research is needed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prescription hypnotic medications may carry significant risks.
“This particularly important since prescription hypnotic medications may carry significant risks(239-243).”
From Sleep: important considerations for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (2016) · cites this paper as [239]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- KRIPKE, D. F.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- KRIPKE, DANIEL F.
- ORCID
- KRIPKE, DANIEL F.
- Venue
- Journal of Sleep Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-21
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-250
- ISSN
- 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2869
- OpenAlex
- W2023243110
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R56HL071123, HL071123, R01HL071123, HL07156001)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH68545, R01MH068545)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Keywords
- hypnotics, non-melanoma skin cancer, cancer risk, zaleplon, eszopiclone, ramelteon, zolpidem, clastogenicity, rodent carcinogenicity, drug safety, randomized controlled trials
- MeSH terms
- Eszopiclone, Zolpidem, Acetamides, Animals, Carcinoma, Basal Cell, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Cross-Sectional Studies, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Indenes, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Melanoma, Piperazines, Pyridines, Pyrimidines, Skin Neoplasms, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Causality, Incidence, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Azabicyclo Compounds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review