CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 156Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring the error in sleep estimation in normal subjects and in patients with insomnia: Quantification of sleep misperception

MANCONI, MAURO, FERRI, RAFFAELE, SAGRADA, CAROLINA, PUNJABI, NARESH M., TETTAMANZI, ELISABETTA, ZUCCONI, MARCO, OLDANI, ALESSANDRO, CASTRONOVO, VINCENZA, FERINI-STRAMBI, LUIGI·2010·Journal of Sleep Research
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00801.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The aims of this study were to measure the error in sleep estimation in normal controls and subjects with primary insomnia to establish the minimum amount of sleep needed for reliable subjective estimation and to depict the distribution of the error in sleep estimation in both groups. A two-step retrospective (study 1) and prospective (study 2) validation study was carried out. Study 1 included 288 normal subjects [176 females and 112 males, mean age 58.5 years, standard deviation (SD) 7.23]. Study 2 included 159 patients (98 females and 61 males; mean age 49.1 years, SD 12.71) with primary insomnia. Participants underwent a full-night polysomnographic study, followed by a morning assessment of subjective sleep parameters. A misperception index (MI) was computed using the following formula: MI = [objective total sleep time (oTST)-subjective total sleep time (sTST)]/oTST. The statistical properties of this index were analysed in detail in both groups. In controls, the Bland-Altman test demonstrated the reliability of this index for values of oTST >120 min. Healthy subjects estimated their sleep time correctly, while insomniacs largely underestimated their sleep time. Statistical analysis of the distribution of MI in insomnia patients disclosed the presence of two subgroups, one with moderate sleep misperception (132 patients) and the other with high sleep misperception (27 patients). The latter presented MI values >or=0.9, exhibiting statistical properties different from those with MI <0.9 and from normal subjects. The MI gives a reliable and immediate description of sleep misperception in healthy and insomnia subjects. Its application supports the existence of the high misperception of insomnia as a separate pathological entity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00801.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. American Academy of Sleep Medicine International Classification of Sleep Disorders, 2005, Diagnostic and Coding Manual
  2. American Psychiatric Association., 2000, American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR)
  3. Magnèe, 2002, The quantification of sleep misperception in primary insomniacs, Sleep-Wake Res. Netherlands, 13, 71

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–156 of 156

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
MANCONI, M., FERRI, R., SAGRADA, C., PUNJABI, N. M., TETTAMANZI, E., ZUCCONI, M., OLDANI, A., CASTRONOVO, V., & FERINI-STRAMBI, L.
Affiliations
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
  • I.R.C.C.S. Oasi Maria SS (IT)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
MANCONI, MAURO
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-10
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
478-486
ISSN
0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00801.x
OpenAlex
W1525640205
Cited by
156
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 2029 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
sleep misperception, primary insomnia, polysomnography validation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Self Disclosure, Sleep, Time Factors, Linear Models, Polysomnography, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review