The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A quantitative analysis of the abundance and demography of European hares Lepus europaeus in relation to habitat type, intensity of agriculture and climate
Open accessAbstract
1. European hares Lepus europaeus have declined throughout Europe since the 1960s. Possible reasons for this include agricultural intensification and changes in climate and predator numbers, but no clear consensus has been reached as to the relative importance of each of these. We aimed to identify factors associated with high and low hare numbers throughout Europe, to determine which could have caused population declines. 2. Results of 77 research papers from 12 European countries were summarized. Relationships between hare density and demographics and habitat, climate, hunting and predator variables were examined and quantified where possible. Temporal changes in factors identified as being associated with high or low numbers of hares were then examined to see if they could explain population declines. 3. Data from pastural habitats were limited, but densities of hares were low. Arable habitats had higher densities than mixed areas in spring, unless farming was intensive in which case densities were similar. In autumn the two habitats had similar densities. Field size, temperature, precipitation and hunting had no effect on density throughout Europe. Fecundity was affected by climate. 4. Arable land, various crops, fallow habitat and temperature were positively associated, and monoculture, precipitation and predators negatively associated with hare abundance. The relationship of field size, pasture and woodland with abundance depended on spatial scale. 5. Habitat changes caused by agricultural intensification are the ultimate cause of hare population declines. Effects of changes in climate or predator numbers are magnified by the loss of high‐quality year‐round forage and cover. Further research is required on how habitat changes affect fecundity and survival, and to identify which parameters have the greatest impact on population numbers. Farmland management policies that target the re‐establishment of some of the habitat diversity lost within fields, farms and landscapes will help to reverse the decline of the European hare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?
Benton, T. G., Vickery, J. A., & Wilson, J. D. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00011-9 · Cited by 3,205
Role of rabies in recent demographic changes in Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) populations in Europe
CHAUTAN, M., PONTIER, D., & ARTOIS, M. (2000) · mamm · doi:10.1515/mamm.2000.64.4.391 · Cited by 154
Cited by
Higher yields and more biodiversity on smaller farms
Ricciardi, V., Mehrabi, Z., Wittman, H., James, D., & Ramankutty, N. (2021) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-021-00699-2 · Cited by 292
Heterogeneity fosters biodiversity: linking history and ecology of dry calcareous grasslands
Diacon-Bolli, J., Dalang, T., Holderegger, R., & Bürgi, M. (2012) · Basic and Applied Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2012.10.004 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- SMITH, R. K., VAUGHAN JENNINGS, N., & HARRIS, S.
- Venue
- Mammal Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 0305-1838 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2907
- OpenAlex
- W2073133533
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A quantitative analysis of the abundance and demography of European hares Lepus europaeus in relation to habitat type, intensity of agriculture and climate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00057.x
- The paper
- SMITH, R. K., VAUGHAN JENNINGS, N., & HARRIS, S. (2005). A quantitative analysis of the abundance and demography of European hares Lepus europaeus in relation to habitat type, intensity of agriculture and climate. Mammal Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00057.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.