The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise
Abstract
Since the last thorough review of the effects of anthropogenic noise on cetaceans in 1995, a substantial number of research reports has been published and our ability to document response(s), or the lack thereof, has improved. While rigorous measurement of responses remains important, there is an increased need to interpret observed actions in the context of population‐level consequences and acceptable exposure levels. There has been little change in the sources of noise, with the notable addition of noise from wind farms and novel acoustic deterrent and harassment devices (ADDs/AHDs). Overall, the noise sources of primary concern are ships, seismic exploration, sonars of all types and some AHDs. Responses to noise fall into three main categories: behavioural, acoustic and physiological. We reviewed reports of the first two exhaustively, reviewing all peer‐reviewed literature since 1995 with exceptions only for emerging subjects. Furthermore, we fully review only those studies for which received sound characteristics (amplitude and frequency) are reported, because interpreting what elicits responses or lack of responses is impossible without this exposure information. Behavioural responses include changes in surfacing, diving and heading patterns. Acoustic responses include changes in type or timing of vocalizations relative to the noise source. For physiological responses we address the issues of auditory threshold shifts and ‘stress’, albeit in a more limited capacity; a thorough review of physiological consequences is beyond the scope of this paper. Overall, we found significant progress in the documentation of responses of cetaceans to various noise sources. However, we are concerned about the lack of investigation into the potential effects of prevalent noise sources such as commercial sonars, depth finders and fisheries acoustics gear. Furthermore, we were surprised at the number of experiments that failed to report any information about the sound exposure experienced by their experimental subjects. Conducting experiments with cetaceans is challenging and opportunities are limited, so use of the latter should be maximized and include rigorous measurements and or modelling of exposure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of underwater sound
Urick, R. J. (1975) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 3,036
Principles of underwater sound
(2011) · Passive Acoustic Monitoring of Cetaceans · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511977107.003 · Cited by 2,257
(1995) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-02253-3 · Cited by 1,568
A digital acoustic recording tag for measuring the response of wild marine mammals to sound
Johnson, M. P., & Tyack, P. L. (2003) · IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering · doi:10.1109/joe.2002.808212 · Cited by 898
Self-citationDecline in Relative Abundance of Bottlenose Dolphins Exposed to Long‐Term Disturbance
BEJDER, L., SAMUELS, A., WHITEHEAD, H., GALES, N., MANN, J., CONNOR, R., HEITHAUS, M., WATSON‐CAPPS, J., FLAHERTY, C., & KRÜTZEN, M. (2006) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00540.x · Cited by 658
Munk, W. H., Worcester, P. F., & Wunsch, C. I. (1995) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511666926 · Cited by 469
Gas-bubble lesions in stranded cetaceans
Jepson, P. D., Arbelo, M., Deaville, R., Patterson, I. A. P., Castro, P., Baker, J. R., Degollada, E., Ross, H. M., Herráez, P., Pocknell, A. M., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/425575a · Cited by 432
Gutiérrez-Solana, R. (1999) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 387
Nowacek, S. M., Wells, R. S., & Solow, A. R. (2001) · Marine Mammal Science · doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.2001.tb01292.x · Cited by 343
Fernández, A., Edwards, J. F., Rodrı́guez, F., Monteros, A. E. D. L., Herraez, P., Alonso, P. Á. C., Jaber, J. R., Martin, V. M., & Arbelo, M. (2005) · Veterinary Pathology · doi:10.1354/vp.42-4-446 · Cited by 342
Cited by
Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics
Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Martin, S. W., Mellinger, D. K., Ward, J. A., Moretti, D. J., Harris, D., & Tyack, P. L. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12001 · Cited by 746
Self-citationAcoustic masking in marine ecosystems: intuitions, analysis, and implication
Clark, C., Ellison, W., Southall, B., Hatch, L., Van Parijs, S., Frankel, A., & Ponirakis, D. (2009) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps08402 · Cited by 594
Migratory marine species: their status, threats and conservation management needs
Lascelles, B., Notarbartolo Di Sciara, G., Agardy, T., Cuttelod, A., Eckert, S., Glowka, L., Hoyt, E., Llewellyn, F., Louzao, M., Ridoux, V., et al. (2014) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.2512 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- NOWACEK, D. P., THORNE, L. H., JOHNSTON, D. W., & TYACK, P. L.
- Venue
- Mammal Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 81-115
- ISSN
- 0305-1838 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2907
- OpenAlex
- W1972433955
- Cited by
- 623
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 17.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2007.00104.x
- The paper
- NOWACEK, D. P., THORNE, L. H., JOHNSTON, D. W., & TYACK, P. L. (2007). Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise. Mammal Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2007.00104.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.