The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dogs Canis familiaris as carnivores: their role and function in intraguild competition
Abstract
1 Dogs Canis familiaris are the world's most common carnivore and are known to interact with wildlife as predators, prey, competitors, and disease reservoirs or vectors. 2 Despite these varied roles in the community, the interaction of dogs with sympatric wild carnivore species is poorly understood. We review how dogs have been classified in the literature, and illustrate how the location and ranging behaviour of dogs are important factors in predicting their interactions with wild prey and carnivores. 3 We detail evidence of dogs as intraguild competitors with sympatric carnivores in the context of exploitative, interference and apparent competition. 4 Dogs can have localized impacts on prey populations, but in general they are not exploitative competitors with carnivores. Rather, most dog populations are highly dependent on human-derived food and gain a relatively small proportion of their diet from wild prey. However, because of human-derived food subsidies, dogs can occur at high population densities and thus could potentially outcompete native carnivores, especially when prey is limited. 5 Dogs can be effective interference competitors, especially with medium-sized and small carnivores. Dogs may fill the role of an interactive medium-sized canid within the carnivore community, especially in areas where the native large carnivore community is depauperate. 6 Dogs can also be reservoirs of pathogens, because most populations around the world are free-ranging and unvaccinated. Diseases such as rabies and canine distemper have resulted in severe population declines in several endangered carnivores coexisting with high-density dog populations. Dogs can therefore be viewed as pathogen-mediated apparent competitors, capable of facilitating large-scale population declines in carnivores. 7 Based on this information, we propose conceptual models that use dog population size and ranging patterns to predict the potential for dogs to be intraguild competitors. We discuss how interactions between dogs and carnivores might influence native carnivore communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competition and intraguild predation among three sympatric carnivores
Fedriani, J. M., Fuller, T. K., Sauvajot, R. M., & York, E. C. (2000) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420000448 · Cited by 463
Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes?
BERGER, K. M., & GESE, E. M. (2007) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01287.x · Cited by 398
Cited by
Big City Life: Carnivores in Urban Environments
Bateman, P. W., & Fleming, P. A. (2012) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00887.x · Cited by 832
Is Wildlife Going to the Dogs? Impacts of Feral and Free-roaming Dogs on Wildlife Populations
Young, J. K., Olson, K. A., Reading, R. P., Amgalanbaatar, S., & Berger, J. (2011) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.7 · Cited by 384
Top predators as biodiversity regulators: the dingo Canis lupus dingo as a case study
Letnic, M., Ritchie, E. G., & Dickman, C. R. (2012) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2011.00203.x · Cited by 331
Integrating social ecology in explanations of wolf–dog behavioral differences
Marshall-Pescini, S., Cafazzo, S., Virányi, Z., & Range, F. (2017) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.002 · Cited by 95
Marshall-Pescini, S., Virányi, Z., Kubinyi, E., & Range, F. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00180 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- VANAK, A. T., & GOMPPER, M. E.
- Venue
- Mammal Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-09-29
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 265-283
- ISSN
- 0305-1838 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2907
- OpenAlex
- W2144430657
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dogs Canis familiaris as carnivores: their role and function in intraguild competition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2009.00148.x
- The paper
- VANAK, A. T., & GOMPPER, M. E. (2009). Dogs Canis familiaris as carnivores: their role and function in intraguild competition. Mammal Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2009.00148.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.