Cited by 377Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical EducationSurgical Simulation and Training

Simulation in undergraduate medical education: bridging the gap between theory and practice

Weller, Jennifer M·2004·Medical Education

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the use of simulation‐based teaching in the medical undergraduate curriculum in the context of management of medical emergencies, using a medium fidelity simulator. Design Small groups of medical students attended a simulation workshop on management of medical emergencies. The workshop was evaluated in a postcourse questionnaire. Subjects All Year 4 medical students allocated to the resuscitation rotation during the first half of 2002. Main outcome measures Student perceptions of learning outcomes, the value of the simulation in the undergraduate curriculum and their self‐assessed improved mastery of workshop material. Results A total of 33 students attended the workshop and all completed questionnaires. Students rated the workshop highly and found it a valuable learning experience. In all, 21 (64%) students identified teamwork skills as key learning points; 11 (33%) felt they had learnt how to approach a problem better, particularly in terms of using a systematic approach, and 12 (36%) felt they had learnt how to apply their theoretical knowledge in a clinical setting better. All 33 students were positive about the use of simulation in their training; 14 students wrote that simulation should be used more or should be mandatory in training; 5 students commented positively on the realism of the learning experience and a further 5 said they valued the opportunity to learn new skills in a safe environment. Conclusion This study demonstrates that medical students value simulation‐based learning highly. In particular, they value the opportunity to apply their theoretical knowledge in a safe and realistic setting, to develop teamwork skills and to develop a systematic approach to a problem. A medium fidelity simulator is a valuable educational tool in medical undergraduate education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01739.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weller, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Weller, Jennifer M
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
32-38
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2102847437
Cited by
377
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Division of Undergraduate Education
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
simulation-based training, undergraduate medical education, medical emergencies, resuscitation training, teamwork skills, theory-practice gap, student perceptions, problem-based learning
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Computer Simulation, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Emergency Medicine, Humans, New Zealand, Teaching, Teaching Materials, Patient Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review