Simulation in undergraduate medical education: bridging the gap between theory and practice
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the use of simulation‐based teaching in the medical undergraduate curriculum in the context of management of medical emergencies, using a medium fidelity simulator. Design Small groups of medical students attended a simulation workshop on management of medical emergencies. The workshop was evaluated in a postcourse questionnaire. Subjects All Year 4 medical students allocated to the resuscitation rotation during the first half of 2002. Main outcome measures Student perceptions of learning outcomes, the value of the simulation in the undergraduate curriculum and their self‐assessed improved mastery of workshop material. Results A total of 33 students attended the workshop and all completed questionnaires. Students rated the workshop highly and found it a valuable learning experience. In all, 21 (64%) students identified teamwork skills as key learning points; 11 (33%) felt they had learnt how to approach a problem better, particularly in terms of using a systematic approach, and 12 (36%) felt they had learnt how to apply their theoretical knowledge in a clinical setting better. All 33 students were positive about the use of simulation in their training; 14 students wrote that simulation should be used more or should be mandatory in training; 5 students commented positively on the realism of the learning experience and a further 5 said they valued the opportunity to learn new skills in a safe environment. Conclusion This study demonstrates that medical students value simulation‐based learning highly. In particular, they value the opportunity to apply their theoretical knowledge in a safe and realistic setting, to develop teamwork skills and to develop a systematic approach to a problem. A medium fidelity simulator is a valuable educational tool in medical undergraduate education.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students reported a subjective increase in competency with the learnt material after a simulation-based workshop.
“found a subjective increase in students competency with the learnt material after a simulation-based workshop”
Students rated the simulation-based workshop highly.
“with students rating the simulations workshop highly [27]”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Makransky, G., Thisgaard, M. W., & Gadegaard, H. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155895 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Wenk, M., Waurick, R., Schotes, D., Wenk, M., Gerdes, C., Van Aken, H. K., & Pöpping, D. M. (2009) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-008-9098-2 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
- Authors
- Weller, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Weller, Jennifer M
- ORCID
- Weller, Jennifer M
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-38
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2102847437
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Division of Undergraduate Education
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
- Keywords
- simulation-based training, undergraduate medical education, medical emergencies, resuscitation training, teamwork skills, theory-practice gap, student perceptions, problem-based learning
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Computer Simulation, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Emergency Medicine, Humans, New Zealand, Teaching, Teaching Materials, Patient Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review