Teaching about child abuse with a mock trial: really good stuff
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mock trials have also been used to promote interprofessional education in health sciences and teach child abuse or ethics in medical education.
“Mock trials have also been used to promote interprofessional education in health sciences (Ghimouz et al., 2021) and teach child abuse (van Wylick & Davidson, 2011) or ethics in medical education (Coelho et al., 2017).”
From Students’ performance and perceptions of mock trials as a teaching and assessment activity over three years at two institutions (2024) · cites this paper as van Wylick & Davidson, 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rosenberg, E., Hsu, S.-Y., Truong, H.-A., & Taheri, R. (2024) · Pharmacy Education · doi:10.46542/pe.2024.241.2939
- Authors
- van Wylick, R., & Davidson, L.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-12
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 517-518
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1765602828
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
- Keywords
- child abuse, mock trial, child abuse detection, clinical skills training
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child Abuse, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Expert Testimony, Humans, Ontario, Role Playing, Teaching, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
