The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interprofessional education: a review of context, learning and the research agenda
Abstract
Medical Education 2012: 46: 58–70 Context Interprofessional education (IPE) is not a recent phenomenon and has been the subject of several World Health Organization reports. Its focus is on health professionals and students learning with, from and about one another to improve collaboration and the quality of patient care. The drivers for IPE include new models of health care delivery in the context of an ageing population and the increasing prevalence of long‐term chronic disease, in addition to the patient safety agenda. The delivery of complex health care requires a team‐based and collaborative approach, although teamwork and collaborative practice are not necessarily synonymous. The rationale for IPE is that learning together enhances future working together. Discussion Systematic reviews of IPE have shown some evidence that IPE fosters positive interaction among different professions and variable evidence that it improves attitudes towards other professionals. Generalisation across published papers is difficult because IPE initiatives are diverse and good evaluation methodology and data are lacking. In terms of constructive alignment from an education viewpoint, there is a need for educators to define learning outcomes and match these with learning activities to ensure that IPE demonstrates added value over uniprofessional learning. Assessment is difficult as pre‐qualification professional education focuses on the individual and professional accreditation organisations mandate only for their own professions. Conclusions Interprofessional education draws from a number of education, sociology and psychology theories, and these are briefly discussed. The most pressing research questions for the IPE community are defined and the challenges for IPE explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M., Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,454
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
Naegele, K. D., & Goffman, E. (1956) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089106 · Cited by 25,991
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
Goffman, E. (2023) · Social Theory Re-Wired · doi:10.4324/9781003320609-59 · Cited by 17,562
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Foucault, M. (1970) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901847000900108 · Cited by 10,859
Psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,626
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America (2002) · Journal For Healthcare Quality · doi:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2002.tb00463.x · Cited by 8,483
Frenk, J., Chen, L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., Fineberg, H., Garcia, P., Ke, Y., Kelley, P., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61854-5 · Cited by 5,960
Cited by
A comparative study of interprofessional education in global health care: A systematic review
Herath, C., Zhou, Y., Gan, Y., Nakandawire, N., Gong, Y., & Lu, Z. (2017) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000007336 · Cited by 164
Are we at risk of groupthink in our approach to teamwork interventions in health care?
Kaba, A., Wishart, I., Fraser, K., Coderre, S., & McLaughlin, K. (2016) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12943 · Cited by 83
Tackling wicked problems: how theories of agency can provide new insights
Varpio, L., Aschenbrener, C., & Bates, J. (2017) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13160 · Cited by 75
Emerging trends in gamification for clinical reasoning education: a scoping review
Lee, C.-Y., Lee, C.-H., Lai, H.-Y., Chen, P.-J., Chen, M.-M., & Yau, S.-Y. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-07044-7 · Cited by 60
Krystallidou, D., Kersbergen, M. J., de Groot, E., Fluit, C. R. M. G., Kuijer-Siebelink, W., Mertens, F., Oosterbaan-Lodder, S. C. M., Scherpbier, N., Versluis, M. A. C., & Pype, P. (2024) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2024.2314203 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Thistlethwaite, J.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12-13
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-70
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W1746815275
- Cited by
- 623
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 42.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interprofessional education: a review of context, learning and the research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04143.x
- The paper
- Thistlethwaite, J. (2012). Interprofessional education: a review of context, learning and the research agenda. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04143.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.