Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Colour vision and speciation in Lake Victoria cichlids of the genus Pundamilia

CARLETON, KAREN L., PARRY, JULIET W. L., BOWMAKER, JAMES K., HUNT, DAVID M., SEEHAUSEN, OLE·2005·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

Lake Victoria cichlids are one of the most speciose groups of vertebrates. Selection on coloration is likely playing an important role in their rapid speciation. To test the hypothesis that sensory biases could explain species differences in mating preferences and nuptial coloration, we studied seven populations of four closely related species of the genus Pundamilia that differ in visual environment and male nuptial colour. Microspectrophotometry determined that the wavelength of maximum absorption (λ max) of the rod pigment and three cone pigments were similar in all four species. Only the long wavelength sensitive (LWS) pigment varied among species, with 3–4 nm shifts in λ max that correlated with differences in the LWS opsin sequence. These subtle shifts in λ max coincided with large shifts in male body colour, with red species having longer LWS pigments than blue species. Furthermore, we observed within and between species a correlation between water transparency and the proportion of red/red vs. red/green double cones. Individuals from turbid water had more red/red double cones than individuals from clear water. The variation in LWS λ max and in the proportion of red/red double cones could lead to differences in perceived brightness that may explain the evolution of variation in male coloration. However, other factors, such as chromophore shifts and higher order neural processing, should also be investigated to fully understand the physiological basis of differential responses to male mating hues in cichlid fish.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02735.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
CARLETON, K. L., PARRY, J. W. L., BOWMAKER, J. K., HUNT, D. M., & SEEHAUSEN, O.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10-31
Volume
14
Issue
14
Pages
4341-4353
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2164658669
Cited by
166
References
2
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colour vision and speciation in Lake Victoria cichlids of the genus Pundamilia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02735.x
The paper
CARLETON, K. L., PARRY, J. W. L., BOWMAKER, J. K., HUNT, D. M., & SEEHAUSEN, O. (2005). Colour vision and speciation in Lake Victoria cichlids of the genus Pundamilia. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02735.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.