The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relative influence of natural selection and geography on gene flow in guppies
Abstract
Two general processes may influence gene flow among populations. One involves divergent selection, wherein the maladaptation of immigrants and hybrids impedes gene flow between ecological environments (i.e. ecological speciation). The other involves geographic features that limit dispersal. We determined the relative influence of these two processes in natural populations of Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). If selection is important, gene flow should be reduced between different selective environments. If geography is important, gene flow should be impeded by geographic distance and physical barriers. We examined how genetic divergence, long‐term gene flow, and contemporary dispersal within a watershed were influenced by waterfalls, geographic distance, predation, and habitat features. We found that waterfalls and geographic distance increased genetic divergence and reduced dispersal and long‐term gene flow. Differences in predation or habitat features did not influence genetic divergence or gene flow. In contrast, differences in predation did appear to reduce contemporary dispersal. We suggest that the standard predictions of ecological speciation may be heavily nuanced by the mating behaviour and life history strategies of guppies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analyzing Tables of Statistical Tests
Rice, W. R. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2409177 · Cited by 14,571
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
Inbreeding depression and genetic load of sexually selected traits: how the guppy lost its spots
Van Oosterhout, C., Trigg, R. E., Carvalho, G. R., Magurran, A. E., Hauser, L., & Shaw, P. W. (2003) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00511.x · Cited by 151
Cited by
SPEAR, S. F., BALKENHOL, N., FORTIN, M., MCRAE, B. H., & SCRIBNER, K. (2010) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04657.x · Cited by 598
Glover, K. A., Solberg, M. F., McGinnity, P., Hindar, K., Verspoor, E., Coulson, M. W., Hansen, M. M., Araki, H., Skaala, Ø., & Svåsand, T. (2017) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12214 · Cited by 363
Population genomics of marine fishes: identifying adaptive variation in space and time
NIELSEN, E. E., HEMMER‐HANSEN, J., LARSEN, P. F., & BEKKEVOLD, D. (2009) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04272.x · Cited by 331
Papadopulos, A. S. T., Kaye, M., Devaux, C., Hipperson, H., Lighten, J., Dunning, L. T., Hutton, I., Baker, W. J., Butlin, R. K., & Savolainen, V. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0342 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- CRISPO, E., BENTZEN, P., REZNICK, D. N., KINNISON, M. T., & HENDRY, A. P.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11-22
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-62
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W1936995236
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relative influence of natural selection and geography on gene flow in guppies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02764.x
- The paper
- CRISPO, E., BENTZEN, P., REZNICK, D. N., KINNISON, M. T., & HENDRY, A. P. (2006). The relative influence of natural selection and geography on gene flow in guppies. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02764.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.