Cited by 211Genetic diversity and population structureMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchCoral and Marine Ecosystems Studies

Contrasting demographic history and phylogeographical patterns in two Indo-Pacific gastropods

CRANDALL, ERIC D., FREY, MELISSA A., GROSBERG, RICHARD K., BARBER, PAUL H.·2008·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

Marine species with ranges that span the Indo-Australian Archipelago (IAA) exhibit a range of phylogeographical patterns, most of which are interpreted in the context of vicariance between Indian and Pacific Ocean populations during Pliocene and Pleistocene low sea-level stands. However, patterns often vary among ecologically similar taxa, sometimes even within genera. This study compares phylogeographical patterns in two species of highly dispersive neritid gastropod, Nerita albicilla and Nerita plicata, with nearly sympatric ranges that span the Indo-Pacific. Mitochondrial COI sequences from >1000 individuals from 97 sites reveal similar phylogenies in both species (two divergent clades differing by 3.2% and 2.3%, for N. albicilla and N. plicata, respectively). However, despite ecological similarity and congeneric status, the two species exhibit phylogeographical discordance. N. albicilla has maintained reciprocal monophyly of Indian and Pacific Ocean populations, while N. plicata is panmictic between oceans, but displays a genetic cline in the Central Pacific. Although this difference might be explained by qualitatively different demographic histories, parameter estimates from three coalescent models indicate that both species have high levels of gene flow between demes (2Nem>75), and share a common history of population expansion that is likely associated with cyclical flooding of continental shelves and island lagoons following low sea-level stands. Results indicate that…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03600.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CRANDALL, E. D., FREY, M. A., GROSBERG, R. K., & BARBER, P. H.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
CRANDALL, ERIC D.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-20
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
611-626
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2107056598
Cited by
211
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 16
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
  • Australian Government
  • University of California, Davis
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Keywords
phylogeography, demographic history, Nerita albicilla, Nerita plicata, Indo-Australian Archipelago, gene flow, population growth, sea-level lowstand, pelagic larval duration, microhabitat associations, sympatric species, mitochondrial COI
MeSH terms
Animals, Australia, DNA, Mitochondrial, Genetics, Population, Geography, Molecular Sequence Data, Pacific Ocean, Phylogeny, Genetic Variation, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Gastropoda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review