The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenetic endemism: a new approach for identifying geographical concentrations of evolutionary history
Abstract
We present a new, broadly applicable measure of the spatial restriction of phylogenetic diversity, termed phylogenetic endemism(PE). PE combines the widely used phylogenetic diversity and weighted endemism measures to identify areas where substantial components of phylogenetic diversity are restricted. Such areas are likely to be of considerable importance for conservation. PE has a number of desirable properties not combined in previous approaches. It assesses endemism consistently, independent of taxonomic status or level, and independent of previously defined political or biological regions. The results can be directly compared between areas because they are based on equivalent spatial units. PE builds on previous phylogenetic analyses of endemism, but provides a more general solution for mapping endemism of lineages. We illustrate the broad applicability of PE using examples of Australian organisms having contrasting life histories: pea‐flowered shrubs of the genus Daviesia(Fabaceae) and the Australian species of the Australo‐Papuan tree frog radiation within the family Hylidae.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002501 · Cited by 31,710
Cited by
A guide to phylogenetic metrics for conservation, community ecology and macroecology
Tucker, C. M., Cadotte, M. W., Carvalho, S. B., Davies, T. J., Ferrier, S., Fritz, S. A., Grenyer, R., Helmus, M. R., Jin, L. S., Mooers, A. O., et al. (2017) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12252 · Cited by 909
Self-citationPhylogenetic diversity and nature conservation: where are we?
Winter, M., Devictor, V., & Schweiger, O. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.015 · Cited by 648
Hypothesis testing in biogeography
Crisp, M. D., Trewick, S. A., & Cook, L. G. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.005 · Cited by 342
Self-citationPrediction of phylogeographic endemism in an environmentally complex biome
Carnaval, A. C., Waltari, E., Rodrigues, M. T., Rosauer, D., VanDerWal, J., Damasceno, R., Prates, I., Strangas, M., Spanos, Z., Rivera, D., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1461 · Cited by 332
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ROSAUER, D., LAFFAN, S. W., CRISP, M. D., DONNELLAN, S. C., & COOK, L. G.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-09-23
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 4061-4072
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W1995816647
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic endemism: a new approach for identifying geographical concentrations of evolutionary history. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04311.x
- The paper
- ROSAUER, D., LAFFAN, S. W., CRISP, M. D., DONNELLAN, S. C., & COOK, L. G. (2009). Phylogenetic endemism: a new approach for identifying geographical concentrations of evolutionary history. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04311.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.