The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptation of Drosophila to a novel laboratory environment reveals temporally heterogeneous trajectories of selected alleles
Open accessAbstract
The genomic basis of adaptation to novel environments is a fundamental problem in evolutionary biology that has gained additional importance in the light of the recent global change discussion. Here, we combined laboratory natural selection (experimental evolution) in Drosophila melanogaster with genome‐wide next generation sequencing of DNA pools (Pool‐Seq) to identify alleles that are favourable in a novel laboratory environment and traced their trajectories during the adaptive process. Already after 15 generations, we identified a pronounced genomic response to selection, with almost 5000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP; genome‐wide false discovery rates < 0.005%) deviating from neutral expectation. Importantly, the evolutionary trajectories of the selected alleles were heterogeneous, with the alleles falling into two distinct classes: (i) alleles that continuously rise in frequency; and (ii) alleles that at first increase rapidly but whose frequencies then reach a plateau. Our data thus suggest that the genomic response to selection can involve a large number of selected SNPs that show unexpectedly complex evolutionary trajectories, possibly due to nonadditive effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agresti, A. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471249688 · Cited by 6,746
Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines
Atwell, S., Huang, Y. S., Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Willems, G., Horton, M., Li, Y., Meng, D., Platt, A., Tarone, A. M., Hu, T. T., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08800 · Cited by 1,780
Evolution Experiments with Microorganisms: The Dynamics and Genetic Bases of Adaptation
Elena, S. F., & Lenski, R. E. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1088 · Cited by 1,386
Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication
Rubin, C.-J., Zody, M. C., Eriksson, J., Meadows, J. R. S., Sherwood, E., Webster, M. T., Jiang, L., Ingman, M., Sharpe, T., Ka, S., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08832 · Cited by 1,138
Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila
Burke, M. K., Dunham, J. P., Shahrestani, P., Thornton, K. R., Rose, M. R., & Long, A. D. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09352 · Cited by 448 · cited 3×
“In contrast, allele frequency changes (AFCs), rather than new mutations, fuel experimental evolution in multicellular organisms (Burke et al. 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialTurner, T. L., Stewart, A. D., Fields, A. T., Rice, W. R., & Tarone, A. M. (2011) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001336 · Cited by 297
Cited by
Evolutionary genomics can improve prediction of species’ responses to climate change
Waldvogel, A.-M., Feldmeyer, B., Rolshausen, G., Exposito-Alonso, M., Rellstab, C., Kofler, R., Mock, T., Schmid, K., Schmitt, I., Bataillon, T., et al. (2020) · Evolution Letters · doi:10.1002/evl3.154 · Cited by 348
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- OROZCO‐terWENGEL, P., KAPUN, M., NOLTE, V., KOFLER, R., FLATT, T., & SCHLÖTTERER, C.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06-21
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 4931-4941
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2133145771
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 10.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptation of Drosophila to a novel laboratory environment reveals temporally heterogeneous trajectories of selected alleles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05673.x
- The paper
- OROZCO‐terWENGEL, P., KAPUN, M., NOLTE, V., KOFLER, R., FLATT, T., & SCHLÖTTERER, C. (2012). Adaptation of Drosophila to a novel laboratory environment reveals temporally heterogeneous trajectories of selected alleles. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05673.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.