Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patterns of fungal communities among and within decaying logs, revealed by 454 sequencing

Kubartová, A., Ottosson, E., Dahlberg, A., Stenlid, J.·2012·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

Owing to previous methodological limitations, knowledge about the fine‐scale distribution of fungal mycelia in decaying logs is limited. We investigated fungal communities in decaying Norway spruce logs at various spatial scales at two environmentally different locations in Sweden. On the basis of 454 pyrosequencing of the ITS 2 region of rDNA, 1914 operational taxonomic units (OTU s) were detected in 353 samples. The communities differed significantly among logs, but the physical distance between logs was not found to have a significant effect on whether fungal communities had any resemblance to each other. Within a log, samples that were closer together generally had communities that showed more resemblance to each other than those that were further apart. OTU s characteristic for particular positions on the logs could be identified. In general, these OTU s did not overlap with the most abundant OTU s, and their ecological role was often unknown. Only a few OTU s were detected in the majority of logs, whereas numerous OTU s were rare and present in only one or a few logs. Wood‐decaying B asidiomycetes were often represented by higher sequence reads in individual logs than A scomycete OTU s, suggesting that B asidiomycete mycelia spread out more rapidly when established. OTU richness tended to increase with the decay stage of the sample; however, the known wood decayers were most abundant in less‐decomposed samples. The fungi identified in the logs represented different ecological strategies. Our findings differ from previously published sporocarp studies, indicating that the highly abundant fruiting species may respond to environment in different ways than the rest of the fungal community.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05723.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Kubartová, A., Ottosson, E., Dahlberg, A., & Stenlid, J.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-09
Volume
21
Issue
18
Pages
4514-4532
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2046197649
Cited by
202
References
1
FWCI
14.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of fungal communities among and within decaying logs, revealed by 454 sequencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05723.x
The paper
Kubartová, A., Ottosson, E., Dahlberg, A., & Stenlid, J. (2012). Patterns of fungal communities among and within decaying logs, revealed by 454 sequencing. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05723.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.