The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DNA repair in the extremely radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Deinococcus radiodurans and other members of the same genus share extraordinary resistance to the lethal and mutagenic effects of ionizing and u.v. radiation and to many other agents that damage DNA. While it is known that this resistance is due to exceedingly efficient DNA repair, the molecular mechanisms responsible remain poorly understood. Following very high exposures to u.v. irradiation (e.g. 500 Jm−2, which is non‐lethal to D. radiodurans), this organism carries out extremely efficient excision repair accomplished by two separate nucleotide excision repair pathways acting simultaneously. One pathway requires the uvrA gene and appears similar to the UvrABC excinuclease pathway defined in Escherichia coli. The other excision repair pathway is specific for u.v. dimeric photoproducts, but is not mediated by a pyrimidine dimer DNA glycosylase. Instead, it is initiated by a second bona fide endonuclease that may recognize both pyrimidine dimers and pyrimidine‐(6–4)pyrimidones. After high doses of ionizing‐radiation (e.g. 1.5Mrad), D. radiodurans can mend >100 double‐strand breaks (dsb) per chromosome without lethality or mutagenesis. Both dsb mending and survival are recA‐dependent, indicating that efficient dsb mending proceeds via homologous recombination. D. radiodurans contains multiple chromosomes per cell, and it is proposed that dsb mending requires extensive recombination amongst these chromosomes, a novel phenomenon in bacteria. Thus, D. radiodurans may serve as an easily accessible model system for the double‐strand‐break‐initiated interchromosomal recombination that occurs in eukaryotic cells during mitosis and meiosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rothschild, L. J., & Mancinelli, R. L. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35059215 · Cited by 2,245
Oxidative Stress Resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans
Slade, D., & Radman, M. (2011) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00015-10 · Cited by 761
Mattimore, V, & Battista, J. R. (1996) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.178.3.633-637.1996 · Cited by 687
Reassembly of shattered chromosomes in Deinococcus radiodurans
Zahradka, K., Slade, D., Bailone, A., Sommer, S., Averbeck, D., Petranovic, M., Lindner, A. B., & Radman, M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05160 · Cited by 444
Structure of the manganese superoxide dismutase from Deinococcus radiodurans in two crystal forms
Dennis, R. J., Micossi, E., McCarthy, J., Moe, E., Gordon, E. J., Kozielski-Stuhrmann, S., Leonard, G. A., & McSweeney, S. (2006) · Acta Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications · doi:10.1107/s1744309106008402 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Minton, K. W.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-15
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2165390912
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA repair in the extremely radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00397.x
- The paper
- Minton, K. W. (1994). DNA repair in the extremely radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00397.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.