The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular analysis of rugosity in a Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor phase variant
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Reversible phase variation between the rugose and smooth colony variants is predicted to be important for the survival of Vibrio cholerae in natural aquatic habitats. Microarray expression profiling studies of the rugose and smooth variants of the same strain led to the identification of 124 differentially regulated genes. Further expression profiling experiments showed how these genes are regulated by the VpsR and HapR transcription factors, which, respectively, positively and negatively regulate production of VPS El Tor, a rugose‐associated extracellular polysaccharide. The study of mutants of rpoN and rpoS demonstrated the effects of these alternative sigma factors on phase variation‐specific gene expression. Bioinformatics analysis of these expression data shows that ‘rugosity’ and ‘smoothness’ are determined by a complex hierarchy of positive and negative regulators, which also affect the biofilm, surface hydrophobicity and motility phenotypes of the organism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Integrating regulatory motif discovery and genome-wide expression analysis
Conlon, E. M., Liu, X. S., Lieb, J. D., & Liu, J. S. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0630591100 · Cited by 343
Self-citation
Cited by
Genetic control of bacterial biofilms
Wolska, K. I., Grudniak, A. M., Rudnicka, Z., & Markowska, K. (2016) · Journal of Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s13353-015-0309-2 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Yildiz, F. H., Liu, X. S., Heydorn, A., & Schoolnik, G. K.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06-16
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 497-515
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2163949809
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.