Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systematic analysis of cyclic di‐GMP signalling enzymes and their role in biofilm formation and virulence in Yersinia pestis

Open access
Bobrov, Alexander G., Kirillina, Olga, Ryjenkov, Dmitri A., Waters, Christopher M., Price, Paul A., Fetherston, Jacqueline D., Mack, Dietrich, Goldman, William E., Gomelsky, Mark, Perry, Robert D.·2011·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Cyclic di‐GMP (c‐di‐GMP) is a signalling molecule that governs the transition between planktonic and biofilm states. Previously, we showed that the diguanylate cyclase HmsT and the putative c‐di‐GMP phosphodiesterase HmsP inversely regulate biofilm formation through control of HmsHFRS‐dependent poly‐β‐1,6‐N‐acetylglucosamine synthesis. Here, we systematically examine the functionality of the genes encoding putative c‐di‐GMP metabolic enzymes in Yersinia pestis . We determine that, in addition to hmsT and hmsP , only the gene y3730 encodes a functional enzyme capable of synthesizing c‐di‐GMP. The seven remaining genes are pseudogenes or encode proteins that do not function catalytically or are not expressed. Furthermore, we show that HmsP has c‐di‐GMP‐specific phosphodiesterase activity. We report that a mutant incapable of c‐di‐GMP synthesis is unaffected in virulence in plague mouse models. Conversely, an hmsP mutant, unable to degrade c‐di‐GMP, is defective in virulence by a subcutaneous route of infection due to poly‐β‐1,6‐N‐acetylglucosamine overproduction. This suggests that c‐di‐GMP signalling is not only dispensable but deleterious for Y. pestis virulence. Our results show that a key event in the evolution of Y. pestis from the ancestral Yersinia pseudotuberculosis was a significant reduction in the complexity of its c‐di‐GMP signalling network likely resulting from the different disease cycles of these human pathogens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07470.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Bobrov, A. G., Kirillina, O., Ryjenkov, D. A., Waters, C. M., Price, P. A., Fetherston, J. D., Mack, D., Goldman, W. E., Gomelsky, M., & Perry, R. D.
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-03
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
533-551
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W2149601262
Cited by
159
References
1
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic analysis of cyclic di‐GMP signalling enzymes and their role in biofilm formation and virulence in Yersinia pestis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07470.x
The paper
Bobrov, A. G., Kirillina, O., Ryjenkov, D. A., Waters, C. M., Price, P. A., Fetherston, J. D., Mack, D., Goldman, W. E., Gomelsky, M., & Perry, R. D. (2011). Systematic analysis of cyclic di‐GMP signalling enzymes and their role in biofilm formation and virulence in Yersinia pestis. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07470.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.