Cited by 161Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyEvolution and Genetic DynamicsBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Fitness‐compensatory mutations in rifampicin‐resistant RNA polymerase

Brandis, Gerrit, Wrande, Marie, Liljas, Lars, Hughes, Diarmaid·2012·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Mutations in rpoB (RNA polymerase β-subunit) can cause high-level resistance to rifampicin, an important first-line drug against tuberculosis. Most rifampicin-resistant (Rif(R)) mutants selected in vitro have reduced fitness, and resistant clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis frequently carry multiple mutations in RNA polymerase genes. This supports a role for compensatory evolution in global epidemics of drug-resistant tuberculosis but the significance of secondary mutations outside rpoB has not been demonstrated or quantified. Using Salmonella as a model organism, and a previously characterized Rif(R) mutation (rpoB R529C) as a starting point, independent lineages were evolved with selection for improved growth in the presence and absence of rifampicin. Compensatory mutations were identified in every lineage and were distributed between rpoA, rpoB and rpoC. Resistance was maintained in all strains showing that increased fitness by compensatory mutation was more likely than reversion. Genetic reconstructions demonstrated that the secondary mutations were responsible for increasing growth rate. Many of the compensatory mutations in rpoA and rpoC individually caused small but significant reductions in susceptibility to rifampicin, and some compensatory mutations in rpoB individually caused high-level resistance. These findings show that mutations in different components of RNA polymerase are responsible for fitness compensation of a Rif(R) mutant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08099.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brandis, G., Wrande, M., Liljas, L., & Hughes, D.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Hughes, Diarmaid
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-31
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
142-151
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W2124443090
Cited by
161
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • VINNOVA
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
rifampicin resistance, RNA polymerase, rpoB, compensatory mutations, fitness cost of resistance, drug-resistant tuberculosis, rpoA, rpoC, secondary mutations, growth rate, reversion, genetic reconstruction
MeSH terms
Antibiotics, Antitubercular, Bacterial Proteins, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mutation, Phenotype, Rifampin, DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases, Salmonella typhimurium, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Genetic Fitness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review