Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supernova 2002bo: inadequacy of the single parameter description

Open access
Benetti, S., Meikle, P., Stehle, M., Altavilla, G., Desidera, S., Folatelli, G., Goobar, A., Mattila, S., Mendez, J., Navasardyan, H., Pastorello, A., Patat, F., Riello, M., Ruiz-Lapuente, P., Tsvetkov, D., Turatto, M., Mazzali, P., Hillebrandt, W.·2004·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present optical/near-infrared photometry and spectra of the type Ia SN 2002bo spanning epochs from -13 days before maximum B-band light to +102 days after. The pre-maximum optical coverage is particularly complete. In some respects, SN 2002bo behaves as a typical "Branch normal" type Ia supernova (SN Ia) at optical and IR wavelengths. We find a B-band risetime of 17.9+-0.5 days, a Dm_{15}(B) of 1.13+-0.05, and a M_B=-19.41+-0.42. However, comparison with other type Ia supernovae having similar Delta m_{15}(B) values indicates that in other respects SN 2002bo is unusual. While the optical spectra of SN 2002bo are very similar to those of SN 1984A, lower velocities and a generally more structured appearance are found in SNe 1990N, 1994D and 1998bu. For supernovae having Dm_(15)(B) > 1.2, we confirm the variation of R(SiII) (Nugent et al. 1995) with Dm_(15)(B). However, for supernovae such as SN2002bo, with lower values of Dm_(15)(B) the relation breaks down. Moreover, the evolution of R(SiII) for SN 2002bo is strikingly different from that shown by other type Ia supernovae. The velocities of SN 2002bo and 1984A derived from SII 5640A, SiII 6355A and CaII H&K lines are either much higher and/or evolve differently from those seen in other normal SNe Ia events. We suggest that the unusually low temperature, the presence of high-velocity intermediate-mass elements and the low abundance of carbon at early times indicates that burning to Si penetrated to much higher layers than in more normal type Ia supernovae. This may be indicative of a delayed-detonation explosion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07357.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Benetti, S., Meikle, P., Stehle, M., Altavilla, G., Desidera, S., Folatelli, G., Goobar, A., Mattila, S., Mendez, J., Navasardyan, H., Pastorello, A., Patat, F., Riello, M., Ruiz-Lapuente, P., Tsvetkov, D., Turatto, M., Mazzali, P., & Hillebrandt, W.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2004-02
Volume
348
Issue
1
Pages
261-278
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2119181643
Cited by
205
References
2
FWCI
13.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supernova 2002bo: inadequacy of the single parameter description. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07357.x
The paper
Benetti, S., Meikle, P., Stehle, M., Altavilla, G., Desidera, S., Folatelli, G., Goobar, A., Mattila, S., Mendez, J., Navasardyan, H., Pastorello, A., Patat, F., Riello, M., Ruiz-Lapuente, P., Tsvetkov, D., Turatto, M., Mazzali, P., & Hillebrandt, W. (2004). Supernova 2002bo: inadequacy of the single parameter description. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07357.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.