The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supernova 2002bo: inadequacy of the single parameter description
Open accessAbstract
We present optical/near-infrared photometry and spectra of the type Ia SN 2002bo spanning epochs from -13 days before maximum B-band light to +102 days after. The pre-maximum optical coverage is particularly complete. In some respects, SN 2002bo behaves as a typical "Branch normal" type Ia supernova (SN Ia) at optical and IR wavelengths. We find a B-band risetime of 17.9+-0.5 days, a Dm_{15}(B) of 1.13+-0.05, and a M_B=-19.41+-0.42. However, comparison with other type Ia supernovae having similar Delta m_{15}(B) values indicates that in other respects SN 2002bo is unusual. While the optical spectra of SN 2002bo are very similar to those of SN 1984A, lower velocities and a generally more structured appearance are found in SNe 1990N, 1994D and 1998bu. For supernovae having Dm_(15)(B) > 1.2, we confirm the variation of R(SiII) (Nugent et al. 1995) with Dm_(15)(B). However, for supernovae such as SN2002bo, with lower values of Dm_(15)(B) the relation breaks down. Moreover, the evolution of R(SiII) for SN 2002bo is strikingly different from that shown by other type Ia supernovae. The velocities of SN 2002bo and 1984A derived from SII 5640A, SiII 6355A and CaII H&K lines are either much higher and/or evolve differently from those seen in other normal SNe Ia events. We suggest that the unusually low temperature, the presence of high-velocity intermediate-mass elements and the low abundance of carbon at early times indicates that burning to Si penetrated to much higher layers than in more normal type Ia supernovae. This may be indicative of a delayed-detonation explosion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Self-citation
Cited by
Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples
Betoule, M., Kessler, R., Guy, J., Mosher, J., Hardin, D., Biswas, R., Astier, P., El-Hage, P., Konig, M., Kuhlmann, S., et al. (2014) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423413 · Cited by 1,905
Self-citationDetermining the Type, Redshift, and Age of a Supernova Spectrum
Blondin, S., & Tonry, J. L. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/520494 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Benetti, S., Meikle, P., Stehle, M., Altavilla, G., Desidera, S., Folatelli, G., Goobar, A., Mattila, S., Mendez, J., Navasardyan, H., Pastorello, A., Patat, F., Riello, M., Ruiz-Lapuente, P., Tsvetkov, D., Turatto, M., Mazzali, P., & Hillebrandt, W.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 348
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 261-278
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2119181643
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supernova 2002bo: inadequacy of the single parameter description. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07357.x
- The paper
- Benetti, S., Meikle, P., Stehle, M., Altavilla, G., Desidera, S., Folatelli, G., Goobar, A., Mattila, S., Mendez, J., Navasardyan, H., Pastorello, A., Patat, F., Riello, M., Ruiz-Lapuente, P., Tsvetkov, D., Turatto, M., Mazzali, P., & Hillebrandt, W. (2004). Supernova 2002bo: inadequacy of the single parameter description. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07357.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.