The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The single-degenerate channel for the progenitors of Type Ia supernovae
Open accessAbstract
We have carried out a detailed study of one of the most favoured evolutionary channels for the production of Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) progenitors, the single-degenerate channel (CO + MS), where a carbon/oxygen (CO) white dwarf (WD) accretes matter from an unevolved or slightly evolved non-degenerate star until it reaches the Chandrasekhar mass limit. Employing Eggleton's stellar evolution code and adopting the prescription of Hachisu et al. for the accretion efficiency, we performed binary stellar evolution calculations for about 2300 close WD binary systems and mapped out the initial parameters in the orbital period–secondary mass (P–M2) plane (for a range of WD masses) which lead to a successful Type Ia supernova. We obtained accurate, analytical fitting formulae to describe this parameter range which can be used for binary population synthesis (BPS) studies. The contours in the P–M2 plane differ from those obtained by Hachisu et al. for low-mass CO WDs, which are more common than massive CO WDs. We confirm that WDs with a mass as low as 0.67 M⊙ can accrete efficiently and reach the Chandrasekhar limit. We have implemented these results in a BPS study to obtain the birth rates for SNe Ia and the evolution of birth rates with time of SNe Ia for both a constant star formation rate and a single starburst. The birth rates are lower than (but comparable to) those inferred observationally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Cited by
The Evolution of Compact Binary Star Systems
Postnov, K. A., & Yungelson, L. R. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-3 · Cited by 486
Progenitors of type Ia supernovae
Wang, B., & Han, Z. (2012) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2012.04.001 · Cited by 377
Self-citationStrolger, L., Riess, A. G., Dahlen, T., Livio, M., Panagia, N., Challis, P., Tonry, J. L., Filippenko, A. V., Chornock, R., Ferguson, H., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/422901 · Cited by 309
Pakmor, R., Kromer, M., Taubenberger, S., & Springel, V. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/770/1/l8 · Cited by 300
Towards an understanding of Type Ia supernovae from a synthesis of theory and observations
Hillebrandt, W., Kromer, M., Röpke, F. K., & Ruiter, A. J. (2013) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.1007/s11467-013-0303-2 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, Z., & Podsiadlowski, P.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 350
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1301-1309
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2063610195
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The single-degenerate channel for the progenitors of Type Ia supernovae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07713.x
- The paper
- Han, Z., & Podsiadlowski, P. (2004). The single-degenerate channel for the progenitors of Type Ia supernovae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07713.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.