The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Towards a unified model for black hole X-ray binary jets
Open accessAbstract
We present a unified semiquantitative model for the disc–jet coupling in black hole X-ray binary systems. In the process we have compiled observational aspects from the existing literature, as well as performing new analyses. We argue that during the rising phase of a black hole transient outburst the steady jet known to be associated with the canonical ‘low/hard’ state persists while the X-ray spectrum initially softens. Subsequently, the jet becomes unstable and an optically thin radio outburst is always associated with the soft X-ray peak at the end of this phase of softening. This peak corresponds to a ‘soft very high state’ or ‘steep power-law’ state. Softer X-ray states are not associated with ‘core’ radio emission. We further demonstrate quantitatively that the transient jets associated with these optically thin events are considerably more relativistic than those in the ‘low/hard’ X-ray state. This in turn implies that, as the disc makes its collapse inwards, the jet Lorentz factor rapidly increases, resulting in an internal shock in the outflow, which is the cause of the observed optically thin radio emission. We provide simple estimates for the efficiency of such a shock in the collision of a fast jet with a previously generated outflow that is only mildly relativistic. In addition, we estimate the jet power for a number of such transient events as a function of X-ray luminosity, and find them to be comparable to an extrapolation of the functions estimated for the ‘low/hard’ state jets. The normalization may be larger, however, which may suggest a contribution from some other power source such as black hole spin, for the transient jets. Finally, we attempt to fit these results together into a coherent semiquantitative model for the disc–jet coupling in all black hole X-ray binary systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes
Yuan, F., & Narayan, R. (2014) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003 · Cited by 1,529
Foundations of Black Hole Accretion Disk Theory
Abramowicz, M. A., & Fragile, P. C. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-1 · Cited by 668
The AGN-obscuring Torus: The End of the "Doughnut" Paradigm?
Elitzur, M., & Shlosman, I. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/508158 · Cited by 489
Advection-dominated accretion and the black hole event horizon
Narayan, R., & McClintock, J. E. (2008) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2008.03.002 · Cited by 451
McKinney, J. C., & Blandford, R. D. (2009) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00625.x · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Fender, R. P., Belloni, T. M., & Gallo, E.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 355
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1105-1118
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2169779235
- Cited by
- 1,331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a unified model for black hole X-ray binary jets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08384.x
- The paper
- Fender, R. P., Belloni, T. M., & Gallo, E. (2004). Towards a unified model for black hole X-ray binary jets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08384.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.