Cited by 38Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

On the formation of cold fronts in massive mergers

Open access
Mathis, H., Lavaux, G., Diego, J. M., Silk, J.·2005·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Using adiabatic hydrodynamical simulations, we follow the evolution of two symmetric cold fronts forming in the remnant of a violent z= 0.3 massive cluster merger. Because the fronts develop after the first passage of the two gas cores of the merging subclusters, and because they soon move ahead of their associated dark matter cores, both the structure and the location of our simulated cold fronts may correspond to a stage that is later than that of most cold fronts observed so far. The cold fronts are preceded by a roughly spherical shock that originates in the centre of the cluster and disappears in the outer regions after 1.6 Gyr. The cold fronts last longer, until z∼ 0. We follow the spatial evolution of the gas of the subcluster cores, and find that a fraction of this gas is liberated in the intracluster medium after core passage, but mainly at apocentre, and that it does not fall back onto the cluster centre. Conversely, we trace back the low-temperature gas constituting the fronts and find that it is initially associated with the two dense cores of the merging clusters. In addition, we find some evidence for discontinuity of the gas velocity field across the edge of the forming cold fronts, suggesting the presence of a contact discontinuity there. In the light of other recent work, we then speculate on the physical mechanism resulting in the cold fronts. We suggest that sloshing induced by strongly varying ram pressure along the subcluster's orbit and/or spatial segregation between the dark matter and gas components of the cores of the subclusters Results in strong tidal forces on the gas, and that these forces could be responsible for the deposition of part of the cold dense gas in the surrounding hot intracluster medium. This deposited gas then expands, cools down further, and constitutes the cold fronts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08589.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After ram pressure pulls the gas back from the center of the subcluster potential, gravity slings it forward (the ram pressure slingshot).

    “after ram pressure pulls the gas back from the center of the subcluster potential, gravity slings it forward (Hallman & Markevitch 2004;Mathis et al. 2005;Markevitch & Vikhlinin 2007;Ng et al. 2015).”

    From The Mismeasure of Mergers: Revised Limits on Self-interacting Dark Matter in Merging Galaxy Clusters (2018) · cites this paper as Mathis et al. 2005

    The Conclusion (p. 17) says ram-pressure stripping is minimal in the simulated cold fronts. It attributes the gas’s outward motion to an effective pressure force that acts opposite to gravity, not to gravity slinging gas forward after ram pressure pulls it back. Section 6.3 (p. 17) describes ram-pressure displacement in a different model by Heinz et al., but does not describe the claimed slingshot mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Heinz S., Churazov E., Forman W., Jones C., Briel U. G., 2003, preprint, astro-ph/0308131 · arXiv
  2. Markevitch M., Vikhlinin A., Forman W. R., 2002b, in Matter and energy in clusters of galaxies, edited by S. Bowyer, C.-Y. Hwang, vol. X of ASP conference series
  3. Voit G. M., Balogh M. L., Bower R. G., Lacey C. G., Bryan G. L., 2003, preprint, astro-ph/0304447 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mathis, H., Lavaux, G., Diego, J. M., & Silk, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay (FR)
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2005-03
Volume
357
Issue
3
Pages
801-818
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1997459440
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
cold fronts, cluster mergers, intracluster medium, gas sloshing, ram pressure stripping, contact discontinuity, tidal forces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review