The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic errors in future weak-lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration
Open accessAbstract
We study the impact of systematic errors on planned weak-lensing surveys and compute the requirements on their contributions so that they are not a dominant source of the cosmological parameter error budget. The generic types of error we consider are multiplicative and additive errors in measurements of shear, as well as photometric redshift errors. In general, more powerful surveys have stronger systematic requirements. For example, for a SuperNova/Acceleration Probe (SNAP)-type survey the multiplicative error in shear needs to be smaller than 1 per cent of the mean shear in any given redshift bin, while the centroids of photometric redshift bins need to be known to be better than 0.003. With about a factor of 2 degradation in cosmological parameter errors, future surveys can enter a self-calibration regime, where the mean systematic biases are self-consistently determined from the survey and only higher order moments of the systematics contribute. Interestingly, once the power-spectrum measurements are combined with the bispectrum, the self-calibration regime in the variation of the equation of state of dark energy wa is attained with only a 20-30 per cent error degradation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Higher-order shear and galaxy statistics and shear peak counts can improve dark energy constraints and provide self-calibration of various systematics ( Takada & Jain 2004; Dolney et al. 2006; Huterer et al. 2006; Petri et al. 2016 ) .”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Huterer et al. 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mathematical Methods for Physicists
Arfken, G. B., & Mathews, J. (1972) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1988084 · Cited by 4,069
Bartelmann, M., & Schneider, P. (2001) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00082-x · Cited by 2,611
Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe
Linder, E. V. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 · Cited by 2,526
ACCELERATING UNIVERSES WITH SCALING DARK MATTER
CHEVALLIER, M., & POLARSKI, D. (2001) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271801000822 · Cited by 2,490
Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory
Bernardeau, F., Colombi, S., GAZTAÑAGA, E., & Scoccimarro, R. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00135-7 · Cited by 2,112
Stable clustering, the halo model and non-linear cosmological power spectra
Smith, R. E., Peacock, J. A., Jenkins, A., White, S. D. M., Frenk, C. S., Pearce, F. R., Thomas, P. A., Efstathiou, G., & Couchman, H. M. P. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06503.x · Cited by 2,054
Mathematical Methods for Physicists
Chow, T. L. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755781 · Cited by 1,338
Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter
Chevallier, M., & Polarski, D. (2001) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 1,075
Power Spectra for Cold Dark Matter and Its Variants
Eisenstein, D. J., & Hu, W. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306640 · Cited by 910
Detection of weak gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
Bacon, D., Refregier, A. R., & Ellis, R. S. (2000) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03851.x · Cited by 623
Wittman, D., Tyson, T., Kirkman, D., Dell’Antonio, I., & Bernstein, G. M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012001 · Cited by 605
Self-citationCross-Correlation Tomography: Measuring Dark Energy Evolution with Weak Lensing
Jain, B., & Taylor, A. N. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.141302 · Cited by 500
Self-citationWeak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure
Refregier, A. R. (2003) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.111302.102207 · Cited by 482
Shapes and Shears, Stars and Smears: Optimal Measurements for Weak Lensing
Bernstein, G., & Jarvis, M. (2001) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/338085 · Cited by 435
Self-citationPower Spectrum Tomography with Weak Lensing
Hu, W. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312210 · Cited by 420
Shear calibration biases in weak-lensing surveys
Hirata, C., & Seljak, U. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06683.x · Cited by 396
Cosmological parameters from lensing power spectrum and bispectrum tomography
Takada, M., & Jain, B. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07410.x · Cited by 390
Self-citationCosmological Model Predictions for Weak Lensing: Linear and Nonlinear Regimes
Jain, B., & Seljak, U. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304372 · Cited by 321
Self-citationSystematic errors in weak lensing: application to SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing
Mandelbaum, R., Hirata, C. M., Seljak, U., Guzik, J., Padmanabhan, N., Blake, C., Blanton, M. R., Lupton, R., & Brinkmann, J. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09282.x · Cited by 316
Foregrounds and Forecasts for the Cosmic Microwave Background
Tegmark, M., Eisenstein, D. J., Hu, W., & Angélica De Oliveira-costa, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/308348 · Cited by 305
Shapes and Shears, Stars and Smears: Optimal Measurements for Weak Lensing
Bernstein, G. M., & Jarvis, M. (2001) · Cited by 299
Self-citationWeak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure
Réfrégier, A. (2003) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 284
Joint galaxy-lensing observables and the dark energy
Wayne Hu, B., & Jain, B. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.043009 · Cited by 270
Self-citationDragan Huterer, A. (2002) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.063001 · Cited by 252
B-modes in cosmic shear from source redshift clustering
Schneider, P., Waerbeke, L. V., & Mellier, Y. (2002) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020626 · Cited by 243
Shear calibration biases in weak lensing surveysPreprint
Hirata, C. M., & Seljak, U. (2003) · Cited by 204
Calibrating the nonlinear matter power spectrum: Requirements for future weak lensing surveys
Dragan Huterer, A., & Takada, M. (2005) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2005.02.006 · Cited by 198
Self-citationWeak-Lensing Results from the 75 Square Degree Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory Survey
Jarvis, M., Bernstein, G. M., Fischer, P., Smith, D., Jain, B., Tyson, T., & Wittman, D. (2003) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/367799 · Cited by 197
Self-citationPower Spectrum Covariance of Weak Gravitational Lensing
Cooray, A., & Hu, W. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/321376 · Cited by 193
Benchmark parameters for CMB polarization experiments
Hu, W., Hedman, M. M., & Zaldarriaga, M. (2003) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.043004 · Cited by 192
Cosmological Model Predictions for Weak Lensing: Linear and Nonlinear RegimesPreprint
Jain, B., Seljak, U. (.-S. C. F. A., & Max-Planck-Institut fuer Astrophysik, G. (. (1996) · Cited by 188
Self-citationConstraints on Ωmand σ8from Weak Lensing in Red‐Sequence Cluster Survey Fields
Hoekstra, H., Yee, H. K. C., & Gladders, M. D. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/342120 · Cited by 185
Systematic errors in weak lensing: application to SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing
Mandelbaum, R., Hirata, C. M., Seljak, U., Guzik, J., Padmanabhan, N., Blake, C., Blanton, M. R., Lupton, R., & Brinkmann, J. (2005) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 179
Weak Lensing: Prospects for Measuring Cosmological Parameters
Hu, W., & Tegmark, M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/311947 · Cited by 166
Heavens, A. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06780.x · Cited by 160
Baryons and weak lensing power spectra
White, M. J. (2004) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2004.06.001 · Cited by 155
Weak lensing with COMBO-17: estimation and removal of intrinsic alignments
Heymans, C., Brown, M. D., Heavens, A., Meisenheimer, K., Taylor, A., & Wolf, C. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07264.x · Cited by 151
Effect of Hot Baryons on the Weak-Lensing Shear Power Spectrum
Zhan, H., & Knox, L. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/426712 · Cited by 144
Majumdar, S., & Mohr, J. J. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/346179 · Cited by 143
Effects of systematic uncertainties on the supernova determination of cosmological parameters
Kim, A., Linder, E. V., Miquel, R., & Mostek, N. J. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07260.x · Cited by 142
B-modes in cosmic shear from source redshift clustering
Schneider, P., Waerbeke, L. V., & Mellier, Y. (2001) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020626/pdf · Cited by 140
Dark energy and matter evolution from lensing tomography
Hu, W. (2002) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.083515 · Cited by 139
Dark Energy Constraints from Weak‐Lensing Cross‐Correlation Cosmography
Bernstein, G., & Jain, B. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/379768 · Cited by 138
Self-citationSelf-calibration of cluster dark energy studies: Counts in cells
Lima, M., & Hu, W. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.043504 · Cited by 135
A New Algorithm for Computing Statistics of Weak Lensing by Large-Scale Structure
White, M., & Hu, W. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309009 · Cited by 128
Second‐Order Corrections to Weak Lensing by Large‐Scale Structure
Cooray, A. R., & Hu, W. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/340892 · Cited by 128
Power Spectrum Covariance of Weak Gravitational Lensing
Cooray, A. R., & Hu, W. (2000) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 120
MacGregor, K. B., & Charbonneau, P. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307389 · Cited by 116
Calibrating photometric redshifts of luminous red galaxies
Padmanabhan, N., Budavári, T., Schlegel, D. J., Bridges, T. J., Brinkmann, J., Cannon, R., Connolly, A. J., Croom, S. M., Csabai, I., Drinkwater, M. J., et al. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08915.x · Cited by 114
Tomography of Lensing Cross-Power Spectra
Takada, M., & White, M. J. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/381870 · Cited by 110
Self-citationLevine, E. S., Schulz, A. E., & White, M. J. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/342119 · Cited by 105
Determination of cosmological parameters from cosmic shear data
Song, Y., & Knox, L. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.063510 · Cited by 100
Self-consistency and calibration of cluster number count surveys for dark energy
Hu, W. (2003) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.081304 · Cited by 98
The effect of imperfect models of point spread function anisotropy on cosmic shear measurements
Hoekstra, H. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07327.x · Cited by 95
Weighing the Cosmological Energy Contents with Weak Gravitational Lensing
Hui, L. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312095 · Cited by 90
Weak Lensing from Space. III. Cosmological Parameters
Refregier, A. R., Massey, R. J., Rhodes, J. D., Ellis, R. S., Albert, J. E., Bacon, D., Bernstein, G. M., McKay, T., & Perlmutter, S. (2004) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/420986 · Cited by 88
Self-citationDark Energy Constraints from Weak Lensing Cross-Correlation Cosmography
Bernstein, G. M., & Jain, B. (2003) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 81
Self-citationSourcelens clustering effects on the skewness of the lensing convergence
Hamana, T., Colombi, S., Thion, A., Devriendt, J., Mellier, Y., & Bernardeau, F. (2002) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05103.x · Cited by 60
Dodelson, S., & Zhang, P. (2005) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.083001 · Cited by 59
Large-Scale Cosmic Shear MeasurementsPreprint
Kaiser, N., Wilson, G., & Luppino, G. A. (2000) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0003338 · Cited by 59
Nulling tomography with weak gravitational lensing
Huterer, D., & White, M. J. (2005) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.043002 · Cited by 56
Self-citationMeasurement of Cosmic Shear with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph
Rhodes, J., Refregier, A. R., Collins, N. R., Gardner, J. P., Groth, E. J., & Hill, R. S. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/382181 · Cited by 55
Weighing the Cosmological Energy Contents with Weak Gravitational LensingPreprint
Hui, L. (1999) · Cited by 54
Growth rate of large-scale structure as a powerful probe of dark energy
Cooray, A. R., Dragan Huterer, A., & Baumann, D. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.027301 · Cited by 52
Self-citationWeak lensing and CMB: Parameter forecasts including a running spectral index
Ishak, M., Hirata, C. M., McDonald, P., & Seljak, U. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.083514 · Cited by 49
Redshift Accuracy Requirements for Future Supernova and Number Count Surveys
Dragan Huterer, A., Kim, A., Krauss, L. M., & Broderick, T. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/424726 · Cited by 44
Probing decisive answers to dark energy questions from cosmic complementarity and lensing tomography
Ishak, M. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09393.x · Cited by 43
White, M. J. (2005) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2005.01.008 · Cited by 40
Constraining dark energy evolution with gravitational lensing by large scale structures
Benabed, K., & Waerbeke, L. V. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.123515 · Cited by 39
Large-Scale Systematic Signals in Weak Lensing Surveys
Vale, C., Hoekstra, H., Waerbeke, L. V., & White, M. J. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/424873 · Cited by 35
MEASUREMENT OF COSMIC SHEAR WITH THE SPACE TELESCOPE IMAGING SPECTROGRAPHPreprint
Rhodes, J. D., Refregier, A. R., Collins, N. R., Jonathan, P., Groth, E. J., & Hill, R. (2003) · Cited by 35
Inhomogeneous systematic signals in cosmic shear observations
Guzik, J., & Bernstein, G. M. (2005) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.043503 · Cited by 28
Self-citationIshak, M., & Hirata, C. M. (2005) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.023002 · Cited by 27
Weak lensing from space I: instrumentation and survey strategy
Rhodes, J. D., Refregier, A. R., Massey, R. J., Albert, J. E., Bacon, D., Bernstein, G. M., Ellis, R. S., Jain, B., Kim, A., Lampton, M., et al. (2003) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2003.10.002 · Cited by 25
Self-citationImpact of Dark Matter Substructure on the Matter and Weak‐Lensing Power Spectra
Hagan, B., Ma, C., & Kravtsov, A. V. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466515 · Cited by 23
Bernstein, G. M. (2002) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/337997 · Cited by 23
Self-citationIs dark energy dynamical? Prospects for an answer
Linder, E. V., & Miquel, R. (2004) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.123516 · Cited by 15
Impact of Dark Matter Substructure on the Matter and Weak Lensing Power Spectra
Hagan, B., Ma, C. P., & Kravtsov, A. V. (2005) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 15
Principal Component Analysis of PSF Variation in Weak Lensing SurveysPreprint
Jarvis, M., & Jain, B. (2004) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0412234 · Cited by 14
Self-citationTwo Windows on Acceleration and Gravitation: Dark Energy or New Gravity?
Knox, L., Song, Y. S., & Tyson, J. A. (2005) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0503644
Effect of Photometric Redshift Uncertainties on Weak Lensing Tomography
Ma, Z., Hu, W., & Huterer, D. (2005) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0506614
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 1997, AA, 322, 1
- 2003, PHYS REV D, 66, 083515
- 2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 347, 909
- 2000, AA, 358, 30
- 2005, APJ, 616, 75L
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Alonso, D., AlSayyad, Y., Anderson, S. F., Andrew, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c · Cited by 4,357
“• Higher-order shear and galaxy statistics that can 26 improve dark energy constraints and provide selfcalibration of various systematics (Takada & Jain 2004; Dolney, Jain & Takada 2006; Huterer et al. 2006).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDark Energy and the Accelerating Universe
Frieman, J. A., Turner, M. S., & Dragan Huterer, A. (2008) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145243 · Cited by 2,100
The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts
Ade, P. A. R., Aguirre, J., Ahmed, Z., Aiola, S., Ali, A., Alonso, D., Alvarez, M. A., Arnold, K., Ashton, P., Austermann, J. E., et al. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/056 · Cited by 1,524
“…lensing analyses currently reach ∼ 1% shear calibration (Zuntz et al. 2017; Fenech Conti et al. 2017; Mandelbaum et al. 2017), relying in most – but not all – cases on image simulations, and are expected to achieve the stringent ∼ 0.5% requirement for LSST, Euclid and WFIRST (Huterer et al. 2006).”
MethodInfluentialDark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Alarcon, A., Aleksić, J., Allam, S., Allen, S., Amara, A., Annis, J., Asorey, J., Avila, S., et al. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043526 · Cited by 1,213
Self-citationKiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
Hildebrandt, H., Viola, M., Heymans, C., Joudaki, S., Kuijken, K., Blake, C., Erben, T., Joachimi, B., Klaes, D., Miller, L., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2805 · Cited by 817
“Any cosmological interpretation requires a very accurate calibration of the photometric redshifts that are used for calculating the model predictions (Huterer et al. 2006; Van Waerbeke et al. 2006).”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Huterer, D., Takada, M., Bernstein, G., & Jain, B.
- Affiliations
- Tohoku University (JP)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-02-11
- Volume
- 366
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-114
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2102084015
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 14.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Keywords
- weak gravitational lensing, systematic errors, photometric redshift errors, self-calibration, dark energy equation of state, power spectrum, bispectrum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
