Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 485

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two populations of progenitors for Type Ia supernovae?

Open access
Mannucci, F., Della Valle, M., Panagia, N.·2006·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We use recent observations of the evolution of the Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) rate with redshift, the dependence of the SN Ia rate on the colours of the parent galaxies, and the enhancement of the SN Ia rate in radio-loud early-type galaxies to derive on robust empirical grounds, the delay time distribution (DTD) between the formation of the progenitor star and its explosion as an SN.Our analysis finds: (i) delay times as long as 3-4 Gyr, derived from observations of SNe Ia at high redshift, cannot reproduce the dependence of the SN Ia rate on the colours and on the radio-luminosity of the parent galaxies, as observed in the local Universe;(ii) the comparison between observed SN rates and a grid of theoretical 'single-population' DTDs shows that only a few of them are possibly consistent with observations.The most successful models are all predicting a peak of SN explosions soon after star formation and an extended tail in the DTD, and can reproduce the data but only at a modest statistical confidence level; (iii) present data are best matched by a bimodal DTD, in which about 50 per cent of SNe Ia (dubbed 'prompt' SNe Ia) explode soon after their stellar birth, in a time of the order of 10 8 yr, while the remaining 50 per cent ('tardy' SNe Ia) have a much wider distribution, well described by an exponential function with a decay time of about 3 Gyr.The presence in the DTD of both a strong peak at early times and a prolonged exponential tail, coupled with the well-established bimodal distribution of the decay rate ( m 15 ) and the systematic difference observed in the expansion velocities of the ejecta of SNe Ia in ellipticals and spirals, suggests the existence of two classes of progenitors.We discuss the cosmological implications of this result and make simple predictions, which are testable with future instrumentation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10501.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 485

Metadata

Authors
Mannucci, F., Della Valle, M., & Panagia, N.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2006-08-01
Volume
370
Issue
2
Pages
773-783
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2126811551
Cited by
485
References
42
FWCI
22.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two populations of progenitors for Type Ia supernovae? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10501.x
The paper
Mannucci, F., Della Valle, M., & Panagia, N. (2006). Two populations of progenitors for Type Ia supernovae? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10501.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.