Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cosmological constraints from the 100-deg2 weak-lensing survey

Open access
Benjamin, Jonathan, Heymans, Catherine, Semboloni, Elisabetta, Van Waerbeke, Ludovic, Hoekstra, Henk, Erben, Thomas, Gladders, Michael D., Hetterscheidt, Marco, Mellier, Yannick, Yee, H. K. C.·2007·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present a cosmic shear analysis of the 100-deg2 weak-lensing survey, combining data from the CFHTLS-Wide, RCS, VIRMOS-DESCART and GaBoDS surveys. Spanning ∼100 deg2, with a median source redshift z∼ 0.78, this combined survey allows us to place tight joint constraints on the matter density parameter Ωm, and the amplitude of the matter power spectrum σ8, finding σ8(Ωm/0.24)0.59= 0.84 ± 0.05. Tables of the measured shear correlation function and the calculated covariance matrix for each survey are included as supplementary material to the online version of this article. The accuracy of our results is a marked improvement on previous work owing to three important differences in our analysis; we correctly account for sample variance errors by including a non-Gaussian contribution estimated from numerical simulations; we correct the measured shear for a calibration bias as estimated from simulated data; we model the redshift distribution, n(z), of each survey from the largest deep photometric redshift catalogue currently available from the CFHTLS-Deep. This catalogue is randomly sampled to reproduce the magnitude distribution of each survey with the resulting survey-dependent n(z) parametrized using two different models. While our results are consistent for the n(z) models tested, we find that our cosmological parameter constraints depend weakly (at the 5 per cent level) on the inclusion or exclusion of galaxies with low-confidence photometric redshift estimates (z > 1.5). These high-redshift galaxies are relatively few in number but contribute a significant weak-lensing signal. It will therefore be important for future weak-lensing surveys to obtain near-infrared data to reliably determine the number of high-redshift galaxies in cosmic shear analyses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12202.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Benjamin, J., Heymans, C., Semboloni, E., Van Waerbeke, L., Hoekstra, H., Erben, T., Gladders, M. D., Hetterscheidt, M., Mellier, Y., & Yee, H. K. C.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2007-09
Volume
381
Issue
2
Pages
702-712
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2050261319
Cited by
204
References
2
FWCI
18.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cosmological constraints from the 100-deg2 weak-lensing survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12202.x
The paper
Benjamin, J., Heymans, C., Semboloni, E., Van Waerbeke, L., Hoekstra, H., Erben, T., Gladders, M. D., Hetterscheidt, M., Mellier, Y., & Yee, H. K. C. (2007). Cosmological constraints from the 100-deg2 weak-lensing survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12202.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.