Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simulations of ultrarelativistic magnetodynamic jets from gamma-ray burst engines

Open access
Tchekhovskoy, Alexander, McKinney, Jonathan C., Narayan, Ramesh·2008·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) require an engine capable of driving a jet of plasma to ultrarelativistic bulk Lorentz factors of up to several hundred and into narrow opening angles of a few degrees. We use global axisymmetric stationary solutions of magnetically dominated (force-free) ultrarelativistic jets to test whether the popular magnetic-driving paradigm can generate the required Lorentz factors and opening angles. Our global solutions are obtained via time-dependent relativistic ideal magnetodynamical numerical simulations which follow the jet from the central engine to beyond six orders of magnitude in radius. Our model is primarily motivated by the collapsar model, in which a jet is produced by a spinning black hole or neutron star and then propagates through a massive stellar envelope. We find that the size of the pre-supernova progenitor star and the radial profile of pressure inside the star determine the terminal Lorentz factor and opening angle of the jet. At the radius where the jet breaks out of the star, our well-motivated fiducial model generates a Lorentz factor γ∼ 400 and a half-opening angle θj∼ 2°, consistent with observations of many long-duration GRBs. Other models with slightly different parameters give γ in the range 100–5000 and θj from to 10°, thus reproducing the range of properties inferred for GRB jets. A potentially observable feature of some of our solutions is that the maximum Poynting flux in the jet is found at θ∼θj with the jet power concentrated in a hollow cone, while the maximum in the Lorentz factor occurs at an angle θ substantially smaller than θj also in a hollow cone. We derive approximate analytical formulae for the radial and angular distribution of γ and the radial dependence of θj. These formulae reproduce the simulation results and allow us to predict the outcome of models beyond those simulated. We also briefly discuss applications to active galactic nuclei, X-ray binaries and short-duration GRBs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13425.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Tchekhovskoy, A., McKinney, J. C., & Narayan, R.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2008-08-01
Volume
388
Issue
2
Pages
551-572
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2054289990
Cited by
267
References
1
FWCI
10.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulations of ultrarelativistic magnetodynamic jets from gamma-ray burst engines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13425.x
The paper
Tchekhovskoy, A., McKinney, J. C., & Narayan, R. (2008). Simulations of ultrarelativistic magnetodynamic jets from gamma-ray burst engines. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13425.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.