Cited by 68Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeAstro and Planetary Science

The effects of thermohaline mixing on low-metallicity asymptotic giant branch stars

Open access
Stancliffe, Richard J.·2010·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We examine the effects of thermohaline mixing on the composition of the envelopes of low-metallicity asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars. We have evolved models of 1, 1.5 and 2 M⊙ from the pre-main sequence to the end of the thermally pulsing AGB with thermohaline mixing applied throughout the simulations. In agreement with other authors, we find that thermohaline mixing substantially reduces the abundance of 3He on the upper part of the red giant branch in our lowest mass model. However, the small amount of 3He that remains is enough to drive thermohaline mixing on the AGB. We find that thermohaline mixing is most efficient in the early thermal pulses and its efficiency drops from pulse to pulse. Nitrogen is not substantially affected by the process, but we do see substantial changes in 13C. The 12C/13C ratio is substantially lowered during the early thermal pulses, but the efficacy of the process is seen to diminish rapidly. As the process stops after a few pulses, the 12C/13C ratio is still able to reach values of 103– 104, which is inconsistent with the values measured in carbon-enhanced metal-poor stars. We also note a surprising increase in the 7Li abundance, with reaching values of over 2.5 in the 1.5 M⊙ model. It is thus possible to get stars which are both C and Li rich at the same time. We compare our models to measurements of carbon and lithium in carbon-enhanced metal-poor stars which have not yet reached the giant branch. These models can simultaneously reproduce the observed C and Li abundances of carbon-enhanced metal-poor turn-off stars that are Li rich, but the observed nitrogen abundances still cannot be matched.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16150.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stancliffe, R. J.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Stancliffe, Richard J.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2010-03-21
Volume
403
Issue
1
Pages
505-515
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2112473853
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
thermohaline mixing, asymptotic giant branch stars, metal-poor stars, stellar envelopes, helium-3, carbon isotope ratio, lithium abundance, nitrogen abundance, carbon-enhanced metal-poor stars, thermally pulsing AGB, stellar nucleosynthesis, stellar evolution models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review