Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modelling CO emission - I. CO as a column density tracer and the X factor in molecular clouds: Modelling CO emission from MCs

Open access
Shetty, Rahul, Glover, Simon C., Dullemond, Cornelis P., Klessen, Ralf S.·2011·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Theoretical and observational investigations have indicated that the abundance of carbon monoxide (CO) is very sensitive to intrinsic properties of the gaseous medium, such as density, metallicity and the background radiation field. CO observations are often employed to study the properties of molecular clouds (MCs), such as mass, morphology and kinematics. It is thus important to understand how well CO traces the total mass, which in MCs is predominantly due to molecular hydrogen (H2). Recent hydrodynamic simulations by Glover & Mac Low have explicitly followed the formation and destruction of molecules in model MCs under varying conditions. These models have confirmed that CO formation strongly depends on the cloud properties. Conversely, the formation of H2 is primarily determined by the amount of time available for its formation. We apply radiative transfer calculations to these MC models in order to investigate the properties of CO line emission. We focus on integrated CO (J= 1–0) intensities emerging from individual clouds, including its relationship to the total, H2 and CO column densities, as well as the ‘X factor,’ the ratio of H2 column density to CO intensity. Models with high CO abundances have a threshold CO intensity of ≈65 K km s−1 at sufficiently large extinctions (or column densities). Clouds with low CO abundances show no such intensity thresholds. The distributions of total and H2 column densities are well described as lognormal functions, though the distributions of CO intensities and column densities are usually not lognormal. In general, the probability distribution functions of the integrated intensity do not follow the distribution functions of CO column densities. In the model with Milky Way-like conditions, the X factor is in agreement with the near-constant value determined from observations. In clouds with lower metallicity, lower density or a higher background UV radiation field, the CO abundances are in general lower, and hence the X factor can vary appreciably – sometimes by up to 4 orders of magnitude. In models with high densities, the CO line is fully saturated, so that the X factor is directly proportional to the molecular column density.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18005.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Shetty, R., Glover, S. C., Dullemond, C. P., & Klessen, R. S.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2011-01-06
Volume
412
Issue
3
Pages
1686-1700
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952192892
Cited by
194
References
0
FWCI
14.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling CO emission - I. CO as a column density tracer and the X factor in molecular clouds: Modelling CO emission from MCs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18005.x
The paper
Shetty, R., Glover, S. C., Dullemond, C. P., & Klessen, R. S. (2011). Modelling CO emission - I. CO as a column density tracer and the X factor in molecular clouds: Modelling CO emission from MCs. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18005.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.