Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Why are most molecular clouds not gravitationally bound?: Unbound molecular clouds

Open access
Dobbs, C. L., Burkert, A., Pringle, J. E.·2011·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The most recent observational evidence seems to indicate that giant molecular clouds are predominantly gravitationally unbound objects. In this paper we show that this is a natural consequence of a scenario in which cloud–cloud collisions and stellar feedback regulate the internal velocity dispersion of the gas, and so prevent global gravitational forces from becoming dominant. Thus, whilst the molecular gas is for the most part gravitationally unbound, local regions within the denser parts of the gas (within the clouds) do become bound and are able to form stars. We find that the observations, in terms of distributions of virial parameters and cloud structures, can be well modelled provided that the star formation efficiency in these bound regions is of the order of 5–10 per cent. We also find that in this picture the constituent gas of individual molecular clouds changes over relatively short time-scales, typically a few Myr.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18371.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Dobbs, C. L., Burkert, A., & Pringle, J. E.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2011-04-15
Volume
413
Issue
4
Pages
2935-2942
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1750379440
Cited by
178
References
0
FWCI
9.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why are most molecular clouds not gravitationally bound?: Unbound molecular clouds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18371.x
The paper
Dobbs, C. L., Burkert, A., & Pringle, J. E. (2011). Why are most molecular clouds not gravitationally bound?: Unbound molecular clouds. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18371.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.