The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular cloud evolution - IV. Magnetic fields, ambipolar diffusion and the star formation efficiency: MC evolution - IV. Magnetic Fields
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the formation and evolution of giant molecular clouds (GMCs) by the collision of convergent warm neutral medium (WNM) streams in the interstellar medium, in the presence of magnetic fields and ambipolar diffusion (AD), focusing on the evolution of the star formation rate and efficiency (SFE), as well as of the mass-to-magnetic-flux ratio (M2FR) in the forming clouds. We find that (1) clouds formed by supercritical inflow streams proceed directly to collapse, while clouds formed by subcritical streams first contract and then re-expand, oscillating on the scale of tens of Myr; (2) our suite of simulations with the initial magnetic field strength of 2, 3 and 4 μ G show that only supercritical or marginal critical streams lead to reasonable star forming rates. This result is not altered by the inclusion of AD; (3) the GMC’s M2FR is a generally increasing function of time, whose growth rate depends on the details of how mass is added to the GMC from the WNM; (4) the M2FR is a highly fluctuating function of position in the clouds. This implies that a significant fraction of a cloud’s mass may remain magnetically supported, while SF occurs in the supercritical regions that are not supported; (5) in our simulations, the SFE approaches stationarity, because mass is added to the GMC at a similar rate to which it converts mass to stars. In such an approximately stationary regime, we find that the SFE provides a proxy of the supercritical mass fraction in the cloud; and (6) the low-M2FR regions exhibit buoyancy within the gravitationally contracting GMCs, so that the latter naturally segregate into a high-density, high-M2FR ‘core’ and a low-density, low-M2FR ‘envelope’, without the intervention of AD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902
“One approach, exemplified by Vázquez-Semadeni et al. (2011) argues that clouds are formed in colliding flows of the warm, neutral medium.”
BackgroundGlobal hierarchical collapse in molecular clouds. Towards a comprehensive scenario
Vázquez-Semadeni, E., Palau, A., Ballesteros-Paredes, J., Gómez, G. C., & Zamora-Avilés, M. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2736 · Cited by 361
Self-citationKrumholz, M. R. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.001 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Vázquez-Semadeni, E., Banerjee, R., Gómez, G. C., Hennebelle, P., Duffin, D., & Klessen, R. S.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-05-04
- Volume
- 414
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2511-2527
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1933730128
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular cloud evolution - IV. Magnetic fields, ambipolar diffusion and the star formation efficiency: MC evolution - IV. Magnetic Fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18569.x
- The paper
- Vázquez-Semadeni, E., Banerjee, R., Gómez, G. C., Hennebelle, P., Duffin, D., & Klessen, R. S. (2011). Molecular cloud evolution - IV. Magnetic fields, ambipolar diffusion and the star formation efficiency: MC evolution - IV. Magnetic Fields. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18569.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.