Cited by 63Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesNuclear physics research studiesGamma-ray bursts and supernovae

A deep insight into the Mg-Al-Si nucleosynthesis in massive asymptotic giant branch and super-asymptotic giant branch stars: Mg-Al-Si nucleosynthesis in massive AGB stars

Open access
Ventura, P., Carini, R., D’Antona, F.·2011·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The stars in globular clusters are known to differ in their surface chemistry: spectroscopic investigations in recent decades outlined the presence of star-to-star differences in the abundances of the light elements, up to aluminium (and possibly silicon), suggesting that some stars were contaminated by an advanced proton-capture nucleosynthesis. The asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars are one of the most promising candidates in producing the pollution of the intracluster medium, via the ejection of gas processed by hot bottom burning, from which new stellar generations are formed. This work is focused on the degree of nucleosynthesis involving magnesium, aluminium and silicon that these sources may experience. The key ingredient in determining the degree of magnesium depletion, and the amount of aluminium that can be produced, is the rate of proton capture on 25Mg, forming 26Al; an increase in this cross-section by a factor of 2 with respect to the highest value allowed by the NACRE compilation allows the reproduction of the extent of the Mg depletion observed, and is in qualitative agreement with the positive Al–Si correlation observed in a few clusters. The main uncertainties associated with the macro- and microphysics input are discussed and commented upon, and a comparison with recent spectroscopic results for globular clusters showing some degree of Mg–Al anticorrelation and Al–Si correlation is presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18997.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The yields from Ventura et al. (2013) suggest that intermediate-mass AGB and superAGB stars may be substantial producers of Na and Al at low metallicities.

    “the yields from Ventura et al. (2013) suggest that intermediate-mass AGB and superAGB stars may be substantial producers of Na and Al at low metallicities (Ventura et al. 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ventura, P., Carini, R., & D’Antona, F.
Affiliations
Astronomical Observatory of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Ventura, P.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2011-06-22
Volume
415
Issue
4
Pages
3865-3871
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1544741049
Cited by
63
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Keywords
asymptotic giant branch stars, super-AGB stars, globular clusters, stellar nucleosynthesis, proton capture reactions, hypomagnesemia, aluminum production, silicon, hot bottom burning, stellar surface abundances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review