Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ameliorating systematic uncertainties in the angular clustering of galaxies: a study using the SDSS-III: Ameliorating systematic uncertainties in w(θ)

Open access
Ross, Ashley J., Ho, Shirley, Cuesta, Antonio J., Tojeiro, Rita, Percival, Will J., Wake, David, Masters, Karen L., Nichol, Robert C., Myers, Adam D., de Simoni, Fernando, Seo, Hee Jong, Hernández-Monteagudo, Carlos, Crittenden, Robert, Blanton, Michael, Brinkmann, J., da Costa, Luiz A. N., Guo, Hong, Kazin, Eyal, Maia, Marcio A. G., Maraston, Claudia, Padmanabhan, Nikhil, Prada, Francisco, Ramos, Beatriz, Sanchez, Ariel, Schlafly, Edward F., Schlegel, David J., Schneider, Donald P., Skibba, Ramin, Thomas, Daniel, Weaver, Benjamin A., White, Martin, Zehavi, Idit·2011·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We investigate the effects of potential sources of systematic error on the angular and photometric redshift, zphot, distributions of a sample of redshift 0.4 < z < 0.7 massive galaxies whose selection matches that of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) constant-mass sample. Utilizing over 112 778 BOSS spectra as a training sample, we produce a photometric redshift catalogue for the galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey eight data release imaging area that, after masking, covers nearly one quarter of the sky (9913 deg2). We investigate fluctuations in the number density of objects in this sample as a function of Galactic extinction, seeing, stellar density, sky background, airmass, photometric offset and North/South Galactic hemisphere. We find that the presence of stars of comparable magnitudes to our galaxies (which are not traditionally masked) effectively removes area. Failing to correct for such stars can produce systematic errors on the measured angular autocorrelation function, w(θ), that are larger than its statistical uncertainty. We describe how one can effectively mask for the presence of the stars, without removing any galaxies from the sample, and minimize the systematic error. Additionally, we apply two separate methods that can be used to correct for the systematic errors imparted by any parameter that can be turned into a map on the sky. We find that failing to properly account for varying sky background introduces a systematic error on w(θ). We measure w(θ), in four zphot slices of width 0.05 between 0.45 < zphot < 0.65, and find that the measurements, after correcting for the systematic effects of stars and sky background, are generally consistent with a generic Λ cold dark matter model, at scales up to 60°. At scales greater than 3° and zphot > 0.5, the magnitude of the corrections we apply is greater than the statistical uncertainty in w(θ). The photometric redshift catalogue we produce will be made publicly available at http://portal.nersc.gov/project/boss/galaxy/photoz/.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19351.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Ross, A. J., Ho, S., Cuesta, A. J., Tojeiro, R., Percival, W. J., Wake, D., Masters, K. L., Nichol, R. C., Myers, A. D., de Simoni, F., Seo, H. J., Hernández-Monteagudo, C., Crittenden, R., Blanton, M., Brinkmann, J., da Costa, L. A. N., Guo, H., Kazin, E., Maia, M. A. G., Maraston, C., Padmanabhan, N., Prada, F., Ramos, B., Sanchez, A., Schlafly, E. F., Schlegel, D. J., Schneider, D. P., Skibba, R., Thomas, D., Weaver, B. A., White, M., & Zehavi, I.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2011-09-06
Volume
417
Issue
2
Pages
1350-1373
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1962010635
Cited by
201
References
4
FWCI
10.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ameliorating systematic uncertainties in the angular clustering of galaxies: a study using the SDSS-III: Ameliorating systematic uncertainties in w(θ). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19351.x
The paper
Ross, A. J., Ho, S., Cuesta, A. J., Tojeiro, R., Percival, W. J., Wake, D., Masters, K. L., Nichol, R. C., Myers, A. D., de Simoni, F., Seo, H. J., Hernández-Monteagudo, C., Crittenden, R., Blanton, M., Brinkmann, J., da Costa, L. A. N., Guo, H., Kazin, E., Maia, M. A. G., . . . Zehavi, I. (2011). Ameliorating systematic uncertainties in the angular clustering of galaxies: a study using the SDSS-III: Ameliorating systematic uncertainties in w(θ). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19351.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.