The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stellar population models at high spectral resolution: High-resolution stellar population models
Open accessAbstract
We present new, high-to-intermediate spectral resolution stellar population models, based on four popular libraries of empirical stellar spectra, namely Pickles, ELODIE, STELIB and MILES. These new models are the same as our previous models, but with higher resolution and based on empirical stellar spectra, while keeping other ingredients the same including the stellar energetics, the atmospheric parameters and the treatment of the thermally pulsating asymptotic giant branch and the horizontal branch morphology. We further compute very high resolution (R= 20 000) models based on the theoretical stellar library MARCS which extends to the near-infrared. We therefore provide merged high-resolution stellar population models, extending from ∼1000 to 25 000 Å, using our previously published high-resolution theoretical models which extended to the ultraviolet. We compare how these libraries perform in stellar population models and highlight spectral regions where discrepancies are found. We confirm our previous findings that the flux around the V band is lower (in a normalized sense) in models based on empirical libraries than in those based on the BaSeL–Kurucz library, which results in a bluer B−V colour. Most noticeably the theoretical library MARCS gives results fully consistent with the empirical libraries. This same effect is also found in other models using MILES, namely Vazdekis et al. and Conroy & Gunn, even though the latter authors reach the opposite conclusion. The bluer predicted B−V colour (by 0.05 mag in our models) is in better agreement with both the colours of luminous red galaxies and globular cluster data. We test the models on their ability to reproduce, through full spectral fitting, the ages and metallicities of Galactic globular clusters as derived from colour–magnitude diagram (CMD) fitting and find overall good agreement. We also discuss extensively the Lick indices calculated directly on the integrated MILES-based spectral energy distributions (SEDs) and compare them with element ratio-sensitive index models. We find a good agreement between the two models, if the metallicity-dependent chemical pattern of the Milky Way stars is properly taken into account in this comparison. As a consequence, the ages and metallicities of Galactic globular clusters are not well reproduced when one uses straight the MILES-based indices, because subtle chemical effects on individual lines dominate the age derivation. The best agreement with the ages of the calibrating globular clusters is found with either element ratio-sensitive absorption-line models or the full SED fitting, for which no particular weight is given to selected lines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Catalog of Parameters for Globular Clusters in the Milky Way
Harris, W. E. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/118116 · Cited by 4,500 · cited 3×
“See M05 for details. the parameters of the best fits are in good agreement with the age values derived in De Angeli et al. (2005) and the metallicities from Harris (1996)8.”
MethodResultInfluentialMaraston, C. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09270.x · Cited by 1,907 · cited 25×
“In the Maraston (2005) models, the library of low-resolution, theoretical stellar spectra compiled by Lejeune et al. (1997, 1998), was adopted.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationTHE ACS SURVEY OF GALACTIC GLOBULAR CLUSTERS. VII. RELATIVE AGES
Marín-Franch, A., Aparicio, A., Piotto, G., Rosenberg, A., Chaboyer, B., Sarajedini, A., Siegel, M., Anderson, J., Bedin, L. R., Dotter, A., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/694/2/1498 · Cited by 494
Cited by
Ahn, C. P., Alexandroff, R., Allende Prieto, C., Anderson, S. F., Anderton, T., Andrews, B. H., Aubourg, É., Bailey, S., Balbinot, E., Barnes, R., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/203/2/21 · Cited by 1,455
Self-citationMoresco, M., Pozzetti, L., Cimatti, A., Jimenez, R., Maraston, C., Verde, L., Thomas, D., Citro, A., Tojeiro, R., & Wilkinson, D. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/014 · Cited by 1,182
Self-citationUV-extended E-MILES stellar population models: young components in massive early-type galaxies
Vazdekis, A., Koleva, M., Ricciardelli, E., Röck, B., & Falcón-Barroso, J. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2231 · Cited by 518
Piotrowska, J. M., Bluck, A. F. L., Maiolino, R., & Peng, Y. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3673 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Maraston, C., & Strömbäck, G.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11-11
- Volume
- 418
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2785-2811
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1794862847
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stellar population models at high spectral resolution: High-resolution stellar population models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19738.x
- The paper
- Maraston, C., & Strömbäck, G. (2011). Stellar population models at high spectral resolution: High-resolution stellar population models. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19738.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.