Cited by 342Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Asteroseismology of old open clusters with Kepler: direct estimate of the integrated red giant branch mass-loss in NGC 6791 and 6819

Open access

Abstract

Mass-loss of red giant branch (RGB) stars is still poorly determined, despite its crucial role in the chemical enrichment of galaxies. Thanks to the recent detection of solar-like oscillations in G–K giants in open clusters with Kepler, we can now directly determine stellar masses for a statistically significant sample of stars in the old open clusters NGC 6791 and 6819. The aim of this work is to constrain the integrated RGB mass-loss by comparing the average mass of stars in the red clump (RC) with that of stars in the low-luminosity portion of the RGB [i.e. stars with L≲L(RC)]. Stellar masses were determined by combining the available seismic parameters νmax and Δν with additional photometric constraints and with independent distance estimates. We measured the masses of 40 stars on the RGB and 19 in the RC of the old metal-rich cluster NGC 6791. We find that the difference between the average mass of RGB and RC stars is small, but significant [ (random) ±0.04 (systematic) M⊙]. Interestingly, such a small does not support scenarios of an extreme mass-loss for this metal-rich cluster. If we describe the mass-loss rate with Reimers prescription, a first comparison with isochrones suggests that the observed is compatible with a mass-loss efficiency parameter in the range 0.1 ≲η≲ 0.3. Less stringent constraints on the RGB mass-loss rate are set by the analysis of the ∼2 Gyr old NGC 6819, largely due to the lower mass-loss expected for this cluster, and to the lack of an independent and accurate distance determination. In the near future, additional constraints from frequencies of individual pulsation modes and spectroscopic effective temperatures will allow further stringent tests of the Δν and νmax scaling relations, which provide a novel, and potentially very accurate, means of determining stellar radii and masses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19859.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kepler data for metal-rich old open clusters constrain the amount of mass lost on the RGB to be less than results from applying the commonly used Reimer's mass-loss prescription.

    “Kepler data for metal-rich old open clusters have provided some constraints, with the amount of mass lost on the RGB estimated to be less than results from applying the commonly used Reimer's mass-loss prescription (Reimers 1975; Kudritzki & Reimers 1978; Miglio et al. 2012).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. Althaus, 2010, ApJ, 719, 612, 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/612 · DOI
  2. Basu, 2011, ApJ, 729, L10, 10.1088/2041-8205/729/1/L10 · DOI
  3. Bedding, 2011, Nat, 471, 608, 10.1038/nature09935 · DOI
  4. Bedin, 2005, ApJ, 624, L45, 10.1086/430310 · DOI
  5. Bedin, 2008a, ApJ, 678, 1279, 10.1086/529370 · DOI
  6. Bedin, 2008b, ApJ, 679, L29, 10.1086/589151 · DOI
  7. Belkacem, 2011, A&A, 530, A142, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116490 · DOI
  8. Bertelli, 1994, A&AS, 106, 275
  9. Bertelli, 2008, A&A, 484, 815, 10.1051/0004-6361:20079165 · DOI
  10. Bowen, 1988, ApJ, 329, 299, 10.1086/166378 · DOI
  11. Boyer, 2009, ApJ, 705, 746, 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/746 · DOI
  12. Boyer, 2010, ApJ, 711, L99, 10.1088/2041-8205/711/2/L99 · DOI
  13. Bragaglia, 2001, AJ, 121, 327, 10.1086/318042 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Brogaard, 2011, A&A, 525, A2, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015503 · DOI
  15. Brown, 1991, ApJ, 368, 599, 10.1086/169725 · DOI
  16. Brown, 2001, ApJ, 562, 368, 10.1086/323862 · DOI
  17. Carretta, 2009, A&A, 505, 139, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912097 · DOI
  18. Castellani, 1993, ApJ, 407, 649, 10.1086/172547 · DOI
  19. Catelan, 2000, ApJ, 531, 826, 10.1086/308506 · DOI
  20. Catelan, 2009, Ap&SS, 320, 261, 10.1007/s10509-009-9987-8 · DOI
  21. Chaboyer, 1999, AJ, 117, 1360, 10.1086/300794 · DOI
  22. Chaplin, 1998, MNRAS, 300, 1077, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01999.x · DOI
  23. D’Antona, 2004, ApJ, 611, 871, 10.1086/422334 · DOI
  24. D’Antona, 2002, A&A, 395, 69, 10.1051/0004-6361:20021220 · DOI
  25. Deloye, 2002, ApJ, 580, 1077, 10.1086/343800 · DOI
  26. Flower, 1996, ApJ, 469, 355, 10.1086/177785 · DOI
  27. Friel, 1993, A&A, 267, 75
  28. Gai, 2011, ApJ, 730, 63, 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/63 · DOI
  29. García, 2011, MNRAS, 414, L6
  30. García-Berro, 2010, Nat, 465, 194, 10.1038/nature09045 · DOI
  31. Goldberg, 1979, R. Astron. Soc., 20, 361
  32. Gratton, 2001, A&A, 369, 87, 10.1051/0004-6361:20010144 · DOI
  33. Han, 2003, MNRAS, 341, 669, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06451.x · DOI
  34. Hansen, 2005, ApJ, 635, 522, 10.1086/496951 · DOI
  35. Hansen, 2007, ApJ, 671, 380, 10.1086/522567 · DOI
  36. Harper G. 1996 Pallavicini R. Deupree A. K. ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 109, Cool Stars; Stellar Systems; and the Sun: 9 Astron. Soc. Pac. 481
  37. Hekker, 2011, A&A, 530, A100, 10.1051/0004-6361/201016303 · DOI
  38. Höfner, 2009, Cosmic Dust - Near and Far, 3
  39. Hole, 2009, AJ, 138, 159, 10.1088/0004-6256/138/1/159 · DOI
  40. Huber, 2009, Commun. Asteroseismol., 160, 74, 10.1553/cia160s74 · DOI
  41. Jenkins, 2010a, ApJ, 713, L87, 10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/L87 · DOI
  42. Jenkins, 2010b, ApJ, 713, L120, 10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/L120 · DOI
  43. Judge, 1991, ApJ, 371, 357, 10.1086/169897 · DOI
  44. Kalirai, 2004, MNRAS, 351, 649, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07813.x · DOI
  45. Kalirai, 2007, ApJ, 671, 748, 10.1086/521922 · DOI
  46. Kalirai, 2009, ApJ, 705, 408, 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/408 · DOI
  47. Kallinger, 2010, A&A, 509, A77, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811437 · DOI
  48. King, 2005, AJ, 130, 626, 10.1086/431327 · DOI
  49. Kjeldsen, 1995, A&A, 293, 87
  50. Koch, 2010, ApJ, 713, L79, 10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/L79 · DOI
  51. Lafon, 1991, The A&AR, 2, 249, 10.1007/BF00872769 · DOI
  52. Lebzelter, 2005, A&A, 441, 1117, 10.1051/0004-6361:20053464 · DOI
  53. McDonald, 2009, MNRAS, 394, 831, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14370.x · DOI
  54. McDonald, 2011a, ApJ, 730, 71, 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/71 · DOI
  55. McDonald, 2011b, ApJS, 193, 23, 10.1088/0067-0049/193/2/23 · DOI
  56. Montalbán, 2010, ApJ, 721, L182, 10.1088/2041-8205/721/2/L182 · DOI
  57. Mosser, 2010, A&A, 517, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014036 · DOI
  58. Mosser, 2011, A&A, 532, A86, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116825 · DOI
  59. Mullan, 1978, ApJ, 226, 151, 10.1086/156595 · DOI
  60. Origlia, 2002, ApJ, 571, 458, 10.1086/339857 · DOI
  61. Origlia, 2006, ApJ, 646, 499, 10.1086/504829 · DOI
  62. Origlia, 2007, ApJ, 667, L85, 10.1086/521980 · DOI
  63. Origlia, 2010, ApJ, 718, 522, 10.1088/0004-637X/718/1/522 · DOI
  64. Peterson, 1998, ApJ, 502, L39, 10.1086/311486 · DOI
  65. Piotto, 2005, ApJ, 621, 777, 10.1086/427796 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Piotto, 2007, ApJ, 661, L53, 10.1086/518503 · DOI
  67. Platais, 2011, ApJ, 733, L1, 10.1088/2041-8205/733/1/L1 · DOI
  68. Ramírez, 2005, ApJ, 626, 446, 10.1086/430101 · DOI
  69. Reimers, 1975a, Mém. Soc. R. Sci. Liège, 8, 369
  70. Reimers, 1975b, Circumstellar Envelopes and Mass Loss of Red Giant Stars, 229
  71. Renzini, 1988, ARA&A, 26, 199, 10.1146/annurev.aa.26.090188.001215 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Schröder, 2005, ApJ, 630, L73, 10.1086/491579 · DOI
  73. Schröder, 2007, A&A, 465, 593, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066633 · DOI
  74. Scuflaire, 2008, Ap&SS, 316, 83, 10.1007/s10509-007-9650-1 · DOI
  75. Stello, 2008, ApJ, 674, L53, 10.1086/528936 · DOI
  76. Stello, 2009, MNRAS, 400, L80, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00767.x · DOI
  77. Stello, 2010, ApJ, 713, L182, 10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/L182 · DOI
  78. Stello, 2011a, ApJ, 737, L10, 10.1088/2041-8205/737/1/L10 · DOI
  79. Stello, 2011b, ApJ, 739, 13, 10.1088/0004-637X/739/1/13 · DOI
  80. Stetson, 2003, PASP, 115, 413, 10.1086/368337 · DOI
  81. Sweigart, 1976, ApJS, 32, 367, 10.1086/190401 · DOI
  82. van Loon, 2008, ApJ, 680, L49, 10.1086/589711 · DOI
  83. Ventura, 2008, Ap&SS, 316, 93, 10.1007/s10509-007-9672-8 · DOI
  84. von, 2005, ApJ, 622, 565, 10.1086/428035 · DOI
  85. White, 2011, ApJ
  86. Wood, 1979, ApJ, 227, 220, 10.1086/156721 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Miglio, A., Brogaard, K., Stello, D., Chaplin, W. J., D’Antona, F., Montalbán, J., Basu, S., Bressan, A., Grundahl, F., Pinsonneault, M., Serenelli, A. M., Elsworth, Y., Hekker, S., Kallinger, T., Mosser, B., Ventura, P., Bonanno, A., Noels, A., Silva Aguirre, V., Szabo, R., Li, J., McCauliff, S., Middour, C. K., & Kjeldsen, H.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Institute of Space Sciences (ES)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Astronomical Observatory of Rome (IT)
  • Institute for Coastal Marine Environment (IT)
  • Konkoly Observatory (HU)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2011-11-18
Volume
419
Issue
3
Pages
2077-2088
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167549591
Cited by
342
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • SDL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • European Commission (2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, 247732, FP7/2007, 269194)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FP7 2007-2013)
  • Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (MB08C 81013)
  • Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PIRG-GA-2009-247732, FP7/2007-2013)
  • Science Mission Directorate
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/J001163/1, FP7/2007-2013)
  • Australian Research Council
  • European Social Fund (2007–2013, FP7/2007-2013)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
asteroseismology, red giant branch mass loss, NGC 6791, NGC 6819, old open clusters, solar-like oscillations, red clump stars, stellar mass, Kepler, metal-rich clusters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review