The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Does participation in a nurse visitation programme reduce the frequency of adverse perinatal outcomes in first-time mothers?
Abstract
Children First (C1), a nurse home visitation programme for first-time mothers, was implemented statewide in Oklahoma in mid-1997. The objective of this study was to compare the risks of low (< 2500 g) and very low birthweight (< 1500 g), preterm (< 37 weeks) and very preterm (< 30 weeks) deliveries and infant mortality between mothers participating and not participating in C1. All 239,466 Oklahoma birth certificates were reviewed. The C1 and birth certificate databases were matched to identify C1 participants. Mother's age at delivery, education level, race, marital status, prior pregnancy loss or pregnancy risk factors, birthweight and gestational age at delivery were measured from the birth certificates. Death certificates were matched to the birth certificates to identify infant deaths. A Bayesian multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse the data. Among single mothers without pregnancy risk factors, the risks of all study outcomes were lower for participants in C1: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.89, [95% Bayesian Credible Interval (BCI) 0.79, 1.00] for preterm delivery; aOR 0.71, [95% BCI 0.50, 0.98] for very preterm delivery; aOR 0.86, [95% BCI 0.75, 0.98] for low birthweight; aOR 0.77, [95% BCI 0.56, 1.02] for very low birthweight and aOR 0.36, [95% BCI 0.17, 0.63] for infant mortality. These risk reductions were not observed among married mothers. In both single and married mothers, the presence of pregnancy risk factors reduced the impact of C1 on lowering th…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Potentially, home visits by healthcare professionals or trained support workers within the first few days of the birth may offer opportunities for assessment of the mother and newborn, health education, infant feeding support, emotional or practical support and, if necessary, referral to other health professionals or agencies (Carabin 2005; Donovan 2007; Lassi 2015; Shaw 2006).”
From Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period (2021) · cites this paper as Carabin 2005
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 39
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1067/mps.2000.105091 · DOI
- Olds DL, 1986, Improving delivery of prenatal care and outcomes of pregnancy: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation, Pediatrics, 77, 16, 10.1542/peds.77.1.16 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.1997.03550080047038 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.1997.03550080054039 · DOI
- Kitzman H, 2000, Enduring effects of nurse home visitation on maternal life course, JAMA, 283, 1983, 10.1001/jama.283.15.1983 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.89.12.1847 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.110.3.486 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00841.x · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470316696 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1214/ss/1177011136 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476956 · DOI
- 10.1067/mob.2002.127140 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2002.00394.x · DOI
- 10.1258/0956462011922814 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036128 · DOI
- Kramer MS., 1987, Determinants of low birthweight: methodologi‐cal assessment and meta‐analysis, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 65, 663
- 10.1136/bmj.311.7004.531 · DOI
- 10.1053/siny.2000.0025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1602511 · DOI
- 10.1093/phr/114.1.71 · DOI
- Oklahoma State Department of Health., 2002, Maternal, Infant, and Child Health: Selected Demographic Profiles, 2001 Report.
- 10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70347-0 · DOI
- Hillier SL, 1993, The relationship of amniotic fluid cytokines and preterm delivery, amniotic fluid infection, histologic chorioamnionitis, and chorioamnion infection, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 81, 941
- 10.1067/mob.2000.105386 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.105.6.1216 · DOI
- 10.1053/siny.1999.0005 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2001.00203.x · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Carabin, H., Cowan, L. D., Beebe, L. A., Skaggs, V. J., Thompson, D., & Agbangla, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
- Oklahoma State Department of Health (US)
- World Health Organization (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Carabin, Hélène
- Venue
- Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04-27
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 194-205
- ISSN
- 0269-5022 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3016
- OpenAlex
- W1979132956
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Keywords
- home-visit nursing, primiparous women, low birth weight, very low birth weight, preterm birth, very preterm birth, infant mortality, perinatal complications, single mothers, pregnancy risk factors, prenatal care, maternal health interventions, Oklahoma, birth certificate data, death certificate data, socioeconomic status
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Oklahoma, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, Nurse's Role, Premature Birth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review