Cited by 39Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareInfant Development and Preterm CareGlobal Maternal and Child Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Does participation in a nurse visitation programme reduce the frequency of adverse perinatal outcomes in first-time mothers?

Abstract

Children First (C1), a nurse home visitation programme for first-time mothers, was implemented statewide in Oklahoma in mid-1997. The objective of this study was to compare the risks of low (< 2500 g) and very low birthweight (< 1500 g), preterm (< 37 weeks) and very preterm (< 30 weeks) deliveries and infant mortality between mothers participating and not participating in C1. All 239,466 Oklahoma birth certificates were reviewed. The C1 and birth certificate databases were matched to identify C1 participants. Mother's age at delivery, education level, race, marital status, prior pregnancy loss or pregnancy risk factors, birthweight and gestational age at delivery were measured from the birth certificates. Death certificates were matched to the birth certificates to identify infant deaths. A Bayesian multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse the data. Among single mothers without pregnancy risk factors, the risks of all study outcomes were lower for participants in C1: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.89, [95% Bayesian Credible Interval (BCI) 0.79, 1.00] for preterm delivery; aOR 0.71, [95% BCI 0.50, 0.98] for very preterm delivery; aOR 0.86, [95% BCI 0.75, 0.98] for low birthweight; aOR 0.77, [95% BCI 0.56, 1.02] for very low birthweight and aOR 0.36, [95% BCI 0.17, 0.63] for infant mortality. These risk reductions were not observed among married mothers. In both single and married mothers, the presence of pregnancy risk factors reduced the impact of C1 on lowering th…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2005.00651.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 39

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1067/mps.2000.105091 · DOI
  2. Olds DL, 1986, Improving delivery of prenatal care and outcomes of pregnancy: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation, Pediatrics, 77, 16, 10.1542/peds.77.1.16 · DOI
  3. 10.1001/jama.1997.03550080047038 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1001/jama.1997.03550080054039 · DOI
  5. Kitzman H, 2000, Enduring effects of nurse home visitation on maternal life course, JAMA, 283, 1983, 10.1001/jama.283.15.1983 · DOI
  6. 10.2105/AJPH.89.12.1847 · DOI
  7. 10.1542/peds.110.3.486 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00841.x · DOI
  9. 10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/9780470316696 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1214/ss/1177011136 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476956 · DOI
  13. 10.1067/mob.2002.127140 · DOI
  14. 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2002.00394.x · DOI
  15. 10.1258/0956462011922814 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036128 · DOI
  17. Kramer MS., 1987, Determinants of low birthweight: methodologi‐cal assessment and meta‐analysis, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 65, 663
  18. 10.1136/bmj.311.7004.531 · DOI
  19. 10.1053/siny.2000.0025 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.2307/1602511 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/phr/114.1.71 · DOI
  22. Oklahoma State Department of Health., 2002, Maternal, Infant, and Child Health: Selected Demographic Profiles, 2001 Report.
  23. 10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70347-0 · DOI
  24. Hillier SL, 1993, The relationship of amniotic fluid cytokines and preterm delivery, amniotic fluid infection, histologic chorioamnionitis, and chorioamnion infection, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 81, 941
  25. 10.1067/mob.2000.105386 · DOI
  26. 10.1542/peds.105.6.1216 · DOI
  27. 10.1053/siny.1999.0005 · DOI
  28. 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2001.00203.x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Carabin, H., Cowan, L. D., Beebe, L. A., Skaggs, V. J., Thompson, D., & Agbangla, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
  • Oklahoma State Department of Health (US)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Carabin, Hélène
Venue
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04-27
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
194-205
ISSN
  • 0269-5022 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3016
OpenAlex
W1979132956
Cited by
39
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
home-visit nursing, primiparous women, low birth weight, very low birth weight, preterm birth, very preterm birth, infant mortality, perinatal complications, single mothers, pregnancy risk factors, prenatal care, maternal health interventions, Oklahoma, birth certificate data, death certificate data, socioeconomic status
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Oklahoma, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, Nurse's Role, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review