Cited by 16Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchInsect Pheromone Research and ControlInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Relationship between the olfactory sensilla of Papilio demoleus L. larvae and their orientation responses to different odours

SAXENA, K. N., PRABHA, SHASHI·1975·Journal of Entomology Series A, General Entomology

Abstract

ABSTRACT Papilio demoleus larvae showed maximum attraction to odours of citral, cirtonellal and citronellol, slightly less to geraniol and 1‐limonene, and low attraction to hydroxy‐citronellal and geranyl acetate. These chemicals (except the last) are the main odorous constituents of the insect's host plant ( Citrus ) leaves. Phellandrene was almost inert, whereas farnesol and d‐limonene elicited a low, and linalool, eugenol and clove oil a high repulsion. Larvae deprived of one antenna and both maxillary palps were similar to normal larvae in their orientational responses. Normal larval responses changed with the inactivation of one or more of the three specific antennal sensilla. A full complement of the three sensilla was not essential for the normal larval response to certain chemicals. Any of the sensilla singly or in combination with any other sensillum could mediate the normal larval response (attraction) to citral and geraniol. For a few other chemicals, certain specific sensilla, singly or in a combination of two, mediated the normal response. Only for d‐limonene were all three sensilla essential for the normal response.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1975.tb00100.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)85092-X · DOI
  2. 10.1101/SQB.1965.030.01.028 · DOI
  3. Clarke C.A., 1956, Hand pairing of butterflies, Lepid. News., 10, 47
  4. Dethier V.G., 1971, A surfeit of stimuli: a paucity of receptors, Am. Scient., 59, 706
  5. 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1969.tb02551.x · DOI
  6. Morita H., 1961, Receptor potentials recorded from sensilla basiconica on the antenna of the silkworm larvae, Bombyx mori, J. exp. Biol., 38, 851, 10.1242/jeb.38.4.851 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.163.3871.1031 · DOI
  8. 10.1163/036551666X00057 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
SAXENA, K. N., & PRABHA, S.
Affiliations
University of Delhi (IN)
Venue
Journal of Entomology Series A, General Entomology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1975-07
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
119-126
ISSN
0047-2409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982388007
Cited by
16
References
0
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Entomology Series A General Entomology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
Papilio demoleus, olfactory sensilla, antennal sensilla, maxillary palp, olfactory orientation, citral, geraniol, D-limonene, plant-insect interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review