Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of increased CO2 concentration and temperature on growth and yield of winter wheat at two levels of nitrogen application

MITCHELL, R. A. C., MITCHELL, V. J., DRISCOLL, S. P., FRANKLIN, J., LAWLOR, D. W.·1993·Plant, Cell & Environment

Abstract

Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L., cv. Mercia) was grown in chambers under light and temperature conditions similar to the UK field environment for the 1990/1991 growing season at two levels each of atmospheric CO 2 concentration (seasonal means: 361 and 692 μmol mol−1), temperature (tracking ambient and ambient +4°C) and nitrogen application (equivalent to 87 and 489 kg ha−1 total N applied). Total dry matter productivity through the season, the maximum number of shoots and final ear number were stimulated by CO 2 enrichment at both levels of the temperature and N treatments. At high N, there was a CO 2‐induced stimulation of grain yield (+15%) similar to that for total crop dry mass (+12%), and there was no significant interaction with temperature. This contrasts with other studies, where positive interactions between the effects of increases in temperature and CO 2 have been found. Temperature had a direct, negative effect on yield at both levels of the N and CO 2 treatments. This could be explained by the temperature‐dependent shortening of the phenological stages, and therefore, the time available for accumulating resources for grain formation. At high N, there was also a reduction in grain set at ambient +4°C temperature, but the overall negative effect of warmer temperature was greater on the number of grains (‐37%) than on yield (‐18%), due to a compensating increase in average grain mass. At low N, despite increasing total crop dry mass and the number of ears, elevated CO 2 did not increase grain yield and caused a significant decrease under ambient temperature conditions. This can be explained in terms of a stimulation of early vegetative growth by CO 2 enrichment leading to a reduction in the amount of N available later for the formation and filling of grain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00899.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
MITCHELL, R. A. C., MITCHELL, V. J., DRISCOLL, S. P., FRANKLIN, J., & LAWLOR, D. W.
Venue
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-06
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
521-529
ISSN
  • 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3040
OpenAlex
W2131433113
Cited by
255
References
26
FWCI
15.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of increased CO2 concentration and temperature on growth and yield of winter wheat at two levels of nitrogen application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00899.x
The paper
MITCHELL, R. A. C., MITCHELL, V. J., DRISCOLL, S. P., FRANKLIN, J., & LAWLOR, D. W. (1993). Effects of increased CO2 concentration and temperature on growth and yield of winter wheat at two levels of nitrogen application. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00899.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.