The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The chemical composition and anatomical structure of leaves of grass species differing in relative growth rate
Abstract
To arrive at a better understanding of variation in specific leaf mass (SLM, leaf weight per unit leaf area), we investigated the chemical composition and anatomical structure of the leaves of 14 grass species varying in potential relative growth rate. Expressed on a dry weight basis, the fast‐growing grass species with low SLM contained relatively more minerals and organic N‐compounds, whereas slow‐growing species with high SLM contained more (hemi)cellulose and lignin. However, when expressed per unit leaf area, organic N‐compounds, (hemi)cellulose, total structural carbohydrates and organic acids increased with increasing SLM. For the 14 grasses, no trend with SLM was found for the leaf volume per unit leaf area. Leaf density was positively correlated with SLM. Variation in density was not caused by variation in the proportion of intercellular spaces. The proportion of the total volume occupied by mesophyll and veins did not differ either. A high SLM was caused, at least partly, by a high proportion of non‐veinal sclerenchymatic cells per cross‐section. The epidermal cell area was negatively correlated with SLM. We conclude that the differences in SLM and in the relative growth rate (RGR) between fast‐ and slow‐growing grass species are based partly on variation in anatomical differentiation and partly on chemical differences within cell types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
NIINEMETS, Ü. (1999) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00466.x · Cited by 750
Cunningham, S. A., Summerhayes, B., & Westoby, M. (1999) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0569:edilsa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 506
Leaf anatomy, specific mass and water content in congeneric annual and perennial grass species
GARNIER, E., & LAURENT, G. (1994) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04036.x · Cited by 408
Impact of microplastics on growth, photosynthesis and essential elements in Cucurbita pepo L.
Colzi, I., Renna, L., Bianchi, E., Castellani, M. B., Coppi, A., Pignattelli, S., Loppi, S., & Gonnelli, C. (2022) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127238 · Cited by 404
Castro-Díez, P., Puyravaud, J. P., & Cornelissen, J. H. C. (2000) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/pl00008873 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- VAN ARENDONK, J. J. C. M., & POORTER, H.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 963-970
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2095713407
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The chemical composition and anatomical structure of leaves of grass species differing in relative growth rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00325.x
- The paper
- VAN ARENDONK, J. J. C. M., & POORTER, H. (1994). The chemical composition and anatomical structure of leaves of grass species differing in relative growth rate. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00325.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.