Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 214

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting responses of photosynthesis and root fraction to elevated [CO2]a: interactions among carbon, nitrogen, and growth*

LUO, Y., FIELD, C. B., MOONEY, H. A.·1994·Plant, Cell & Environment

Abstract

At elevated atmospheric CO 2 concentrations ([CO 2]a), photosynthetic capacity (A max) and root fraction (η R, the ratio of root to plant dry mass) increased in some studies and decreased in others. Here, we have explored possible causes of this, focusing on the relative magnitudes of the effects of elevated [CO 2]a on specific leaf (nm) and plant (np) nitrogen concentrations, leaf mass per unit area (h), and plant nitrogen productivity (α). In our survey of 39 studies with 35 species, we found that elevated [CO 2]a led to decreased nm and np in all the studies and to increased h and α in most of the studies. The magnitudes of these changes varied with species and with experimental conditions. Based on a model that integrated [CO 2]a‐induced changes in leaf nitrogen into a biochemically based model of leaf photosynthesis, we predicted that, to a first approximation, photosynthesis will be upregulated (Amax will increase) when growth at increased [CO 2]a leads to increases in h that are larger than decreases in nm. Photosynthesis will be downregulated (Amax will decrease) when increases in h are smaller than decreases in nm. The model suggests that photosynthetic capacity increases at elevated [CO 2]a only when additional leaf mesophyll more than compensates the effects of nitrogen dilution. We considered two kinds of regulatory paradigms that could lead to varying responses of η R to elevated [CO 2]a, and compared the predictions of each with the data. A simple static model based on the functional balance concept predicts that η R should increase when neither np nor h is very responsive to elevated [CO 2]a. The quantitative and qualitative agreement of the predictions with data from the literature, however, is poor. A model that predicts η R from the relative sensitivities of photosynthesis and relative growth rate to elevated [CO 2]a corresponds much more closely to the observations. In general, root fraction increases if the response of photosynthesis to [CO 2]a is greater than that of relative growth rate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb02017.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
LUO, Y., FIELD, C. B., & MOONEY, H. A.
Venue
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-11
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
1195-1204
ISSN
  • 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3040
OpenAlex
W1985042147
Cited by
214
References
2
FWCI
23.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting responses of photosynthesis and root fraction to elevated [CO2]a: interactions among carbon, nitrogen, and growth*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb02017.x
The paper
LUO, Y., FIELD, C. B., & MOONEY, H. A. (1994). Predicting responses of photosynthesis and root fraction to elevated [CO2]a: interactions among carbon, nitrogen, and growth*. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb02017.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.