Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 378

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the relationship between leaf anatomy and CO2 diffusion through the mesophyll of hypostomatous leaves

SYVERTSEN, J. P., LLOYD, J., McCONCHIE, C., KRIEDEMANN, P. E., FARQUHAR, G. D.·1995·Plant, Cell & Environment

Abstract

Internal conductances to CO 2 transfer from the stomatal cavity to sites of carboxylation (g i) in hypostomatous sun‐and shade‐grown leaves of citrus, peach and Macadamia trees (Lloyd et al. 1992) were related to anatomical characteristics of mesophyll tissues. There was a consistent relationship between absorptance of photosynthetically active radiation and chlorophyll concentration (mmol m−2) for all leaves, including sclerophyllous Macadamia, whose transmittance was high despite its relatively thick leaves. In thin peach leaves, which had high g i, the chloro‐plast volume and mesophyll surface area exposed to intercellular air spaces (ias) per unit leaf area were similar to those in the thicker leaves of the evergreen species. Peach leaves, however, had the lowest leaf dry weight per area (D/a), the lowest tissue density (Td) and the highest chloro‐plast surface area (Sc) exposed to ias. There were negative correlations between g i and leaf thickness or D/a, but positive correlations between g i and Sc or Sc/T d. We developed a one‐dimensional diffusion model which partitioned g i into a gaseous diffusion conductance through the ias (g ias) plus a liquid‐phase conductance through mesophyll cell walls (g cw). The model accounted for a significant amount of variation (r2=0.80) in measured g i by incorporating both components. The g ias component was related to the one‐dimensional path‐length for diffusion across the mesophyll and so was greater in thinner peach leaves than in leaves of evergreen species. The g cw component was related to tissue density and to the degree of chloroplast exposure to the ias. Thus the negative correlations between g i and leaf thickness or D/a related to g ias whereas positive correlations between g i and S c or S c/T d, related to g cw. The g cw was consistently lower than g ias, and thus represented a greater constraint on CO 2 diffusion in the mesophylls of these hypostomatous species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00348.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 378

Metadata

Authors
SYVERTSEN, J. P., LLOYD, J., McCONCHIE, C., KRIEDEMANN, P. E., & FARQUHAR, G. D.
Venue
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-02
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
149-157
ISSN
  • 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3040
OpenAlex
W2156784274
Cited by
378
References
0
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the relationship between leaf anatomy and CO2 diffusion through the mesophyll of hypostomatous leaves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00348.x
The paper
SYVERTSEN, J. P., LLOYD, J., McCONCHIE, C., KRIEDEMANN, P. E., & FARQUHAR, G. D. (1995). On the relationship between leaf anatomy and CO2 diffusion through the mesophyll of hypostomatous leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00348.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.