The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Foliar maintenance respiration of subalpine and boreal trees and shrubs in relation to nitrogen content
Abstract
A nitrogen‐based model of maintenance respiration (R m) would link R m with nitrogen‐based photosynthesis models and enable simpler estimation of dark respiration flux from forest canopies. To test whether an N‐based model of R m would apply generally to foliage of boreal and subalpine woody plants, I measured R m (CO 2 efflux at night from fully expanded foliage) for foliage of seven species of trees and shrubs in the northern boreal forest (near Thompson, Manitoba, Canada) and seven species in the subalpine montane forest (near Fraser, Colorado, USA). At 10°C, average R m for boreal foliage ranged from 0.94 to 6.8μmol kg−1 s−1 (0.18–0.58 μmol m−2 s−1) and for subalpine foliage it ranged from 0.99 to 7.6 μmol kg−1 s−1 (0.28–0.64μmol m−2 s−1). CO 2 efflux at 10°C for the samples was only weakly correlated with sample weight (r = 0.11) and leaf area (r = 0.58). However, CO 2 efflux per unit foliage weight was highly correlated with foliage N concentration [r = 0.83, CO 2 flux at 10°C (mol kg−1 s−1) = 2.62 × foliage N (mol kg−1)J, and slopes were statistically similar for the boreal and subalpine sites (P=0.28). CO 2 efflux per unit of foliar N was 1.8 times that reported for a variety of crop and wildland species growing in warmer climates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Nitrogen and Lignin Control of Hardwood Leaf Litter Decomposition Dynamics
Melillo, J. M., Aber, J. D., & Muratore, J. F. (1982) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936780 · Cited by 2,641
Cited by
Vegetation and soil respiration: Correlations and controls
Raich, J. W., & Tufekciogul, A. (2000) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1006112000616 · Cited by 1,156
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., & Westoby, M. (2001) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00542.x · Cited by 867
The McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later.
Amthor, J. (2000) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1175 · Cited by 822
Net primary production of forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production?
Waring, R. H., Landsberg, J. J., & Williams, M. (1998) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/18.2.129 · Cited by 686
Bonan, G. B., Levis, S., Kergoat, L., & Oleson, K. W. (2002) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2000gb001360 · Cited by 655
Metadata
- Authors
- RYAN, M. G.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 765-772
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2134504011
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foliar maintenance respiration of subalpine and boreal trees and shrubs in relation to nitrogen content. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00579.x
- The paper
- RYAN, M. G. (1995). Foliar maintenance respiration of subalpine and boreal trees and shrubs in relation to nitrogen content. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00579.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.