The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conifer defence against insects: microarray gene expression profiling of Sitka spruce ( Picea sitchensis ) induced by mechanical wounding or feeding by spruce budworms ( Choristoneura occidentalis ) or white pine weevils ( Pissodes strobi ) reveals large‐scale changes of the host transcriptome
Open accessAbstract
Conifers are resistant to attack from a large number of potential herbivores or pathogens. Previous molecular and biochemical characterization of selected conifer defence systems support a model of multigenic, constitutive and induced defences that act on invading insects via physical, chemical, biochemical or ecological (multitrophic) mechanisms. However, the genomic foundation of the complex defence and resistance mechanisms of conifers is largely unknown. As part of a genomics strategy to characterize inducible defences and possible resistance mechanisms of conifers against insect herbivory, we developed a cDNA microarray building upon a new spruce ( Picea spp.) expressed sequence tag resource. This first‐generation spruce cDNA microarray contains 9720 cDNA elements representing c. 5500 unique genes. We used this array to monitor gene expression in Sitka spruce ( Picea sitchensis ) bark in response to herbivory by white pine weevils ( Pissodes strobi , Curculionidae) or wounding, and in young shoot tips in response to western spruce budworm ( Choristoneura occidentalis , Lepidopterae) feeding. Weevils are stem‐boring insects that feed on phloem, while budworms are foliage feeding larvae that consume needles and young shoot tips. Both insect species and wounding treatment caused substantial changes of the host plant transcriptome detected in each case by differential gene expression of several thousand array elements at 1 or 2 d after the onset of treatment. Overall, there was considerable overlap among differentially expressed gene sets from these three stress treatments. Functional classification of the induced transcripts revealed genes with roles in general plant defence, octadecanoid and ethylene signalling, transport, secondary metabolism, and transcriptional regulation. Several genes involved in primary metabolic processes such as photosynthesis were down‐regulated upon insect feeding or wounding, fitting with the concept of dynamic resource allocation in plant defence. Refined expression analysis using gene‐specific primers and real‐time PCR for selected transcripts was in agreement with microarray results for most genes tested. This study provides the first large‐scale survey of insect‐induced defence transcripts in a gymnosperm and provides a platform for functional investigation of plant–insect interactions in spruce. Induction of spruce genes of octadecanoid and ethylene signalling, terpenoid biosynthesis, and phenolic secondary metabolism are discussed in more detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
CAP3: A DNA Sequence Assembly Program
Huang, X., & Madan, A. (1999) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.9.9.868 · Cited by 5,261
Huber, W., von Heydebreck, A., Sültmann, H., Poustka, A., & Vingron, M. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.s96 · Cited by 2,440
Cited by
From waste products to ecochemicals: Fifty years research of plant secondary metabolism
Hartmann, T. (2007) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.09.017 · Cited by 798
Keeling, C. I., & Bohlmann, J. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01716.x · Cited by 721
Self-citationWhy Does Herbivore Attack Reconfigure Primary Metabolism?
Schwachtje, J., & Baldwin, I. T. (2008) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.107.112490 · Cited by 346
Behavioural and community ecology of plants that cry for help
DICKE, M. (2009) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01913.x · Cited by 337
Monoterpene-induced molecular responses in Arabidopsis thaliana
Godard, K.-A., White, R., & Bohlmann, J. (2008) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.02.011 · Cited by 130
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- RALPH, S. G., YUEH, H., FRIEDMANN, M., AESCHLIMAN, D., ZEZNIK, J. A., NELSON, C. C., BUTTERFIELD, Y. S. N., KIRKPATRICK, R., LIU, J., JONES, S. J. M., MARRA, M. A., DOUGLAS, C. J., RITLAND, K., & BOHLMANN, J.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1545-1570
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2096316585
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conifer defence against insects: microarray gene expression profiling of Sitka spruce ( Picea sitchensis ) induced by mechanical wounding or feeding by spruce budworms ( Choristoneura occidentalis ) or white pine weevils ( Pissodes strobi ) reveals large‐scale changes of the host transcriptome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01532.x
- The paper
- RALPH, S. G., YUEH, H., FRIEDMANN, M., AESCHLIMAN, D., ZEZNIK, J. A., NELSON, C. C., BUTTERFIELD, Y. S. N., KIRKPATRICK, R., LIU, J., JONES, S. J. M., MARRA, M. A., DOUGLAS, C. J., RITLAND, K., & BOHLMANN, J. (2006). Conifer defence against insects: microarray gene expression profiling of Sitka spruce ( Picea sitchensis ) induced by mechanical wounding or feeding by spruce budworms ( Choristoneura occidentalis ) or white pine weevils ( Pissodes strobi ) reveals large‐scale changes of the host transcriptome. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01532.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.