Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,098

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mesophyll conductance to CO2: current knowledge and future prospects

FLEXAS, JAUME, RIBAS‐CARBÓ, MIQUEL, DIAZ‐ESPEJO, ANTONIO, GALMÉS, JERONI, MEDRANO, HIPÓLITO·2008·Plant, Cell & Environment

Abstract

During photosynthesis, CO 2 moves from the atmosphere (Ca) surrounding the leaf to the sub‐stomatal internal cavities (Ci) through stomata, and from there to the site of carboxylation inside the chloroplast stroma (Cc) through the leaf mesophyll. The latter CO 2 diffusion component is called mesophyll conductance (gm), and can be divided in at least three components, that is, conductance through intercellular air spaces (gias), through cell wall (gw) and through the liquid phase inside cells (gliq). A large body of evidence has accumulated in the past two decades indicating that gm is sufficiently small as to significantly decrease Cc relative to Ci, therefore limiting photosynthesis. Moreover, gm is not constant, and it changes among species and in response to environmental factors. In addition, there is now evidence that gliq and, in some cases, gw, are the main determinants of gm. Mesophyll conductance is very dynamic, changing in response to environmental variables as rapid or even faster than stomatal conductance (i.e. within seconds to minutes). A revision of current knowledge on gm is presented. Firstly, a historical perspective is given, highlighting the founding works and methods, followed by a re‐examination of the range of variation of gm among plant species and functional groups, and a revision of the responses of gm to different external (biotic and abiotic) and internal (developmental, structural and metabolic) factors. The possible physiological bases for gm, including aquaporins and carbonic anhydrases, are discussed. Possible ecological implications for variable gm are indicated, and the errors induced by neglecting gm when interpreting photosynthesis and carbon isotope discrimination models are highlighted. Finally, a series of research priorities for the near future are proposed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01757.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,098

Metadata

Authors
FLEXAS, J., RIBAS‐CARBÓ, M., DIAZ‐ESPEJO, A., GALMÉS, J., & MEDRANO, H.
Venue
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-07
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
602-621
ISSN
  • 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3040
OpenAlex
W2112207548
Cited by
1,098
References
4
FWCI
13.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mesophyll conductance to CO2: current knowledge and future prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01757.x
The paper
FLEXAS, J., RIBAS‐CARBÓ, M., DIAZ‐ESPEJO, A., GALMÉS, J., & MEDRANO, H. (2008). Mesophyll conductance to CO2: current knowledge and future prospects. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01757.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.