The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Root decisions
Open accessAbstract
Root systems have recognizable developmental plans when grown in solution or agar; however, these plans often must be modified to cope with the prevailing conditions in the soil environment such as the avoidance of obstacles and the exploitation of nutrient‐rich patches or water zones. The modular structure of roots enables them to respond to their environment, and roots are very adaptive at modifying growth throughout the root system to concentrate their efforts in the areas that are the most profitable. Roots also form associations with microorganisms as a strategy to enhance resource capture. However, while the responses of roots in nutrient patches are well‐recognized, overall ‘rules of response’ and variation in strategy among plant species that can be applied in a number of different environments are still lacking. Finally, there is increasing evidence that root–root interactions are much more sophisticated than previously thought, and the evidence for roots to identify self from non‐self roots will be briefly discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Invasive Plant Suppresses the Growth of Native Tree Seedlings by Disrupting Belowground Mutualisms
Stinson, K. A., Campbell, S. A., Powell, J. R., Wolfe, B. E., Callaway, R. M., Thelen, G. C., Hallett, S. G., Prati, D., & Klironomos, J. N. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140 · Cited by 826 · cited 2×
“…that some invasive plants may release antifungal compounds that act by inhibiting the mycorrhizal fungi on which the native plant species rely (Stinson et al. 2006) and that these phytotoxins are more effective on mycorrhizal fungi present in invaded soils than the invading plants’ native…”
BackgroundGreen plants as intelligent organisms
Trewavas, A. (2005) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.07.005 · Cited by 212
Cited by
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Hinsinger, P., Betencourt, E., Bernard, L., Brauman, A., Plassard, C., Shen, J., Tang, X., & Zhang, F. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.175331 · Cited by 474
Strategies for improving phosphorus acquisition efficiency of crop plants
Ramaekers, L., Remans, R., Rao, I. M., Blair, M. W., & Vanderleyden, J. (2010) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2010.03.001 · Cited by 342
Root apex transition zone: a signalling–response nexus in the root
Baluška, F., Mancuso, S., Volkmann, D., & Barlow, P. W. (2010) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.04.007 · Cited by 286
Hinsinger, P., Brauman, A., Devau, N., Gérard, F., Jourdan, C., Laclau, J.-P., Le Cadre, E., Jaillard, B., & Plassard, C. (2011) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-011-0903-y · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- HODGE, A.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 628-640
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W4210340613
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root decisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01891.x
- The paper
- HODGE, A. (2009). Root decisions. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01891.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.