The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND STRATIFICATION TYPES OF COARSE‐GRAINED POINTBARS: MODERN AND ANCIENT EXAMPLES1
Abstract
SUMMARY: Primary sedimentary structures in modern point bar deposits of the Amite River in Louisiana and the Colorado River in Texas are analogous to features observed in Eocene Simsboro and Pleistocene Colorado River deposits of the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain. Short‐duration peak flow, channel pattern, average stream gradient of about 2–3 ft./mile, and bank stabilization by dense vegetation are major parameters controlling the depositional pattern of coarse sand and pebble gravel of the Amite and Colorado rivers. Stratification is directly related to specific depositional features and consists of: large‐scale trough‐fill cross‐stratification in the scour pool; trough‐fill cross‐stratification and foreset cross‐stratification in the lower point bar; parallel laminae, large foreset cross‐stratification, and trough‐fill cross‐stratification in the chute bar; parallel inclined laminae, climbing ripple laminae, and mud drapes in the chute fill; and parallel inclined laminae, mud drape, and foreset cross‐stratification in overbank, flood‐plain deposits. Fundamental differences between point bars of bed‐load streams (low suspended load/bed load ratio) and mixed‐load streams (high suspended load/bed load ratio) are that upper point bar sediments with small trough sets and parallel inclined laminae occur only in fine‐grained (mixed load) fluvial deposits, and large scale foresets of chute bars are common to coarse‐grained (bed load) fluvial deposits but are not found in fine‐grained fluvial deposits. Upward fining sequences, characteristic of fine‐grained fluvial deposits, are uncommon in sediments deposited by bed‐load streams such as the Amite and Colorado rivers. The Simsboro Sandstone consists mainly of scour pool, lower point bar, and chute bar sediments. Chute fill and flood‐plain deposits are preserved only in the highest stratigraphic sequence. Pleistocene Colorado River deposits display the same sequence of stratification types as the Simsboro but are composed of coarser material.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Flood deposits, Bijou Creek, Colorado, JUNE =")(
McKee, E. D., Crosby, E. J., & Berryhill, H. L. (1967) · Journal of Sedimentary Research · doi:10.1306/74d717b2-2b21-11d7-8648000102c1865d · Cited by 355
Cited by
Gravel-Bed Rivers VI: From Process Understanding to River Restoration
(2007) · Developments in Earth Surface Processes · doi:10.1016/s0928-2025(07)x1100-3 · Cited by 362
Sediment diffusion during overbank flows
PIZZUTO, J. E. (1987) · Sedimentology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3091.1987.tb00779.x · Cited by 339
Fluvial Facies Models: Recent Developments
BRIDGE, J. S. (2011) · Facies Models Revisited · doi:10.2110/pec.06.84.0085 · Cited by 339
Davies, N. S., & Gibling, M. R. (2010) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.11.002 · Cited by 337
River channel and bar patterns explained and predicted by an empirical and a physics‐based method
Kleinhans, M. G., & van den Berg, J. H. (2011) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.2090 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- McGOWEN, J. H., & GARNER, L. E.
- Venue
- Sedimentology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1970-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 77-111
- ISSN
- 0037-0746 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3091
- OpenAlex
- W2088312067
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND STRATIFICATION TYPES OF COARSE‐GRAINED POINTBARS: MODERN AND ANCIENT EXAMPLES1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1970.tb00184.x
- The paper
- McGOWEN, J. H., & GARNER, L. E. (1970). PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND STRATIFICATION TYPES OF COARSE‐GRAINED POINTBARS: MODERN AND ANCIENT EXAMPLES1. Sedimentology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1970.tb00184.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.