Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND STRATIFICATION TYPES OF COARSE‐GRAINED POINTBARS: MODERN AND ANCIENT EXAMPLES1

McGOWEN, J. H., GARNER, L. E.·1970·Sedimentology

Abstract

SUMMARY: Primary sedimentary structures in modern point bar deposits of the Amite River in Louisiana and the Colorado River in Texas are analogous to features observed in Eocene Simsboro and Pleistocene Colorado River deposits of the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain. Short‐duration peak flow, channel pattern, average stream gradient of about 2–3 ft./mile, and bank stabilization by dense vegetation are major parameters controlling the depositional pattern of coarse sand and pebble gravel of the Amite and Colorado rivers. Stratification is directly related to specific depositional features and consists of: large‐scale trough‐fill cross‐stratification in the scour pool; trough‐fill cross‐stratification and foreset cross‐stratification in the lower point bar; parallel laminae, large foreset cross‐stratification, and trough‐fill cross‐stratification in the chute bar; parallel inclined laminae, climbing ripple laminae, and mud drapes in the chute fill; and parallel inclined laminae, mud drape, and foreset cross‐stratification in overbank, flood‐plain deposits. Fundamental differences between point bars of bed‐load streams (low suspended load/bed load ratio) and mixed‐load streams (high suspended load/bed load ratio) are that upper point bar sediments with small trough sets and parallel inclined laminae occur only in fine‐grained (mixed load) fluvial deposits, and large scale foresets of chute bars are common to coarse‐grained (bed load) fluvial deposits but are not found in fine‐grained fluvial deposits. Upward fining sequences, characteristic of fine‐grained fluvial deposits, are uncommon in sediments deposited by bed‐load streams such as the Amite and Colorado rivers. The Simsboro Sandstone consists mainly of scour pool, lower point bar, and chute bar sediments. Chute fill and flood‐plain deposits are preserved only in the highest stratigraphic sequence. Pleistocene Colorado River deposits display the same sequence of stratification types as the Simsboro but are composed of coarser material.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1970.tb00184.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
McGOWEN, J. H., & GARNER, L. E.
Venue
Sedimentology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1970-04
Volume
14
Issue
1-2
Pages
77-111
ISSN
  • 0037-0746 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3091
OpenAlex
W2088312067
Cited by
268
References
1
FWCI
25.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND STRATIFICATION TYPES OF COARSE‐GRAINED POINTBARS: MODERN AND ANCIENT EXAMPLES1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1970.tb00184.x
The paper
McGOWEN, J. H., & GARNER, L. E. (1970). PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND STRATIFICATION TYPES OF COARSE‐GRAINED POINTBARS: MODERN AND ANCIENT EXAMPLES1. Sedimentology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1970.tb00184.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.