The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A phylogenetic analysis of the fungus‐growing ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Attini) based on morphological characters of the larvae
Abstract
A phylogenetic hypothesis of the fungus‐growing ants (subfamily Myrmicinae, tribe Attini) is proposed, based on a cladistic analysis utilizing forty‐four morphological characters (109 states) of the prepupal worker larva. The fifty‐one attine species analysed include representatives of eleven of the twelve currently recognized attine genera, excluding only the monotypic workerless parasite Pseudoatta ; the non‐attines include two outgroups (species of the basal myrmicine genera Myrmica and Pogonomyrmex ), two myrmicine species presumed to be distantly related to the attines, and twelve species representing taxa that have been proposed by prior workers as possible sister groups of the Attini. There is strong character support for the monophyly of the Attini and for a sister‐group relationship of the Attini and the Neotropical Blepharidatta brasiliensis. The Attini are divided into two distinct lineages, an ‘apterostigmoid’ clade (containing Apterostigma and Mycocepurus) and an ‘attoid’ clade (containing all other attine genera except Myrmicocrypta). The attine genus Myrmicocrypta appears to be paraphyletic with respect to these two groups; the species M.buenzlii in particular retains many attine plesiomorphies. These results indicate that the fungus‐growing behaviour had a single evolutionary origin in the ants. They also indicate that mycelium cultivation is plesiomorphic and that yeast cultivation is derived within the Attini, overturning the long‐standing assumption that the yeast‐growing Cyphomyrmex species are the most primitive Attini. Behavioural and ecological investigations into the origin and evolution of the fungus‐growing behaviour might more profitably focus on species in the attine genus Myrmicocrypta , as well as those in the closely related non‐attine genera Blepharidatta and Wasmannia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fungus-growing ants use antibiotic-producing bacteria to control garden parasites
Currie, C. R., Scott, J. A., Summerbell, R. C., & Malloch, D. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19519 · Cited by 853
The Evolution of Agriculture in Ants
Mueller, U. G., Rehner, S. A., & Schultz, T. R. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5385.2034 · Cited by 423
Self-citationSilliman, B. R., & Newell, S. Y. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2535227100 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- SCHULTZ, T. R., & MEIER, R.
- Venue
- Systematic Entomology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 337-370
- ISSN
- 0307-6970 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3113
- OpenAlex
- W2110520788
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A phylogenetic analysis of the fungus‐growing ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Attini) based on morphological characters of the larvae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3113.1995.tb00100.x
- The paper
- SCHULTZ, T. R., & MEIER, R. (1995). A phylogenetic analysis of the fungus‐growing ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Attini) based on morphological characters of the larvae. Systematic Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.1995.tb00100.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.