Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional genomics uncovers three glucosyltransferases involved in the synthesis of the major sweet glucosides of Stevia rebaudiana

Open access
Richman, Alex, Swanson, Andrew, Humphrey, Tania, Chapman, Ralph, McGarvey, Brian, Pocs, Robert, Brandle, Jim·2005·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Stevia rebaudiana leaves accumulate a mixture of at least eight different steviol glycosides. The pattern of glycosylation heavily influences the taste perception of these intensely sweet compounds. The majority of the glycosides are formed by four glucosylation reactions that start with steviol and end with rebaudioside A. The steps involve the addition of glucose to the C‐13 hydroxyl of steviol, the transfer of glucose to the C‐2′ and C‐3′ of the 13‐O‐glucose and the addition of glucose to the hydroxyl of the C‐4 carboxyl group. We used our collection of ESTs, an UDP‐glucosyltransferase (UGT)‐specific electronic probe and key word searches to identify candidate genes resident in our collection. Fifty‐four expressed sequence tags (ESTs) belonging to 17 clusters were found using this procedure. We isolated full length cDNAs for 12 of the UGTs, cloned them into an expression vector, and produced recombinant enzymes in Escherichia coli. An in vitro glucosyltransferase activity enzyme assay was conducted using quercetin, kaempferol, steviol, steviolmonoside, steviolbioside, and stevioside as sugar acceptors, and 14 C‐UDP‐glucose as the donor. Thin layer chromatography was used to separate the products and three of the recombinant enzymes produced labelled products that co‐migrated with known standards. HPLC and LC‐ES/MS were then used to further define those reaction products. We determined that steviol UGTs behave in a regioselective manner and propose a modified pathway for the synthesis of rebaudioside A from steviol.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02275.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Richman, A., Swanson, A., Humphrey, T., Chapman, R., McGarvey, B., Pocs, R., & Brandle, J.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11-11
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
56-67
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W1908977317
Cited by
262
References
1
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional genomics uncovers three glucosyltransferases involved in the synthesis of the major sweet glucosides of Stevia rebaudiana. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02275.x
The paper
Richman, A., Swanson, A., Humphrey, T., Chapman, R., McGarvey, B., Pocs, R., & Brandle, J. (2005). Functional genomics uncovers three glucosyltransferases involved in the synthesis of the major sweet glucosides of Stevia rebaudiana. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02275.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.